This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Mary Pride article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article was nominated for deletion on 7 January 2007. The result of the discussion was No consensus. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Loaded language. I think it should be rephrased; in another part of the article she's described as a feminist activist. Kate e kate e ( talk) 19:47, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Deleted inappropriate content. Please see talk page guidelines. (link at the top of this page) Thanks. - Fairness & Accuracy For All 11:47, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
An image used in this article, File:Pride complete guide.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 12 June 2012
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Pride complete guide.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 17:52, 12 June 2012 (UTC) |
>"She has been accused of denying and defending child abuse. [....] Mitchell Stevens, a Hamilton College sociologist, has criticized Pride for exhibiting feminist values in her lifestyle much more than in what she espouses."
Could more information be added here? I'm interested in knowing more about this and I'll bet many readers are as well. Rissa, Guild of Copy Editors ( talk) 03:31, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
"She has been accused by R.L. Stollar (an advocate for children and abuse survivors) and other bloggers of minimizing child abuse statistics." If bloggers are not considered legitimate sources for use in Wikipedia articles should their criticism be included in this page? I imagine you can find blogs that criticize just about anything you could write a Wiki page about. It would seem better to me to just provide her quotes about child abuse in the "Books and views" section of the article, leave it at that, and let readers draw their own conclusions. Let me know your thoughts. Refriedintern ( talk) 17:16, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Since there was no dispute from other editors, I removed the aforementioned section from this article. The criticism itself does warrant inclusion in the article if it can be found from more reputable sources. Let me know your thoughts. Refriedintern ( talk) 20:56, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mary Pride. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:51, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Mary Pride article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article was nominated for deletion on 7 January 2007. The result of the discussion was No consensus. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Loaded language. I think it should be rephrased; in another part of the article she's described as a feminist activist. Kate e kate e ( talk) 19:47, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Deleted inappropriate content. Please see talk page guidelines. (link at the top of this page) Thanks. - Fairness & Accuracy For All 11:47, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
An image used in this article, File:Pride complete guide.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 12 June 2012
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Pride complete guide.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 17:52, 12 June 2012 (UTC) |
>"She has been accused of denying and defending child abuse. [....] Mitchell Stevens, a Hamilton College sociologist, has criticized Pride for exhibiting feminist values in her lifestyle much more than in what she espouses."
Could more information be added here? I'm interested in knowing more about this and I'll bet many readers are as well. Rissa, Guild of Copy Editors ( talk) 03:31, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
"She has been accused by R.L. Stollar (an advocate for children and abuse survivors) and other bloggers of minimizing child abuse statistics." If bloggers are not considered legitimate sources for use in Wikipedia articles should their criticism be included in this page? I imagine you can find blogs that criticize just about anything you could write a Wiki page about. It would seem better to me to just provide her quotes about child abuse in the "Books and views" section of the article, leave it at that, and let readers draw their own conclusions. Let me know your thoughts. Refriedintern ( talk) 17:16, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Since there was no dispute from other editors, I removed the aforementioned section from this article. The criticism itself does warrant inclusion in the article if it can be found from more reputable sources. Let me know your thoughts. Refriedintern ( talk) 20:56, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mary Pride. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:51, 31 December 2016 (UTC)