Mary Jane Patterson has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 7, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 January 2024 and 2 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): History314, Liviahana, Just.an.incredible.fool, Natep8 ( article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by SGB.His370 ( talk) 03:35, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello! As requested by Balance person on the June 2024 Women in Green editathon event page, here is a quick 20-minute assessment of the article to help with preparation for a Good Article (GA) nomination:
The article looks fundamentally pretty good. There are certainly some prose issues which I might expect to be picked up on, but that isn't too much of a problem for GA status and should be easy enough to deal with in a review. For instance, the article is currently inconsistent about whether "black" should be capitalised or uncapitalised (per MOS:RACECAPS, either is acceptable, but we should be consistent within an article!). Another example: the paragraph beginning "Although the African-American educator..." seems very long to me, and might do better split (perhaps with a new paragraph beginning "When Greener left...")
There are a few more significant issues, though they should all be relatively easy fixes:
There is conflicting data on how many siblings she had, but most sources cite between seven and tenis not supported by either of the subsequent citations, neither of which mentions her siblings at all.
Caeciliusinhorto-public ( talk) 09:32, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Balance person ( talk · contribs) 15:15, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Mike Christie ( talk · contribs) 18:36, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
I'll review this.
Mike Christie (
talk -
contribs -
library)
18:36, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Images are appropriately tagged.
Looking at the sources:
Since the article might change if any of these have to be removed, I'll pause the review until these questions are resolved. Mike Christie ( talk - contribs - library) 19:47, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
OK, looks good. I'll do spotchecks next; footnote numbers refer to this version.
Just the one quote needed for verification.
Reading through the article:
That's everything I can see. Mike Christie ( talk - contribs - library) 18:24, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Balance person ( talk) 11:52, 8 July 2024 (UTC).
Mary Jane Patterson has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 7, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 January 2024 and 2 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): History314, Liviahana, Just.an.incredible.fool, Natep8 ( article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by SGB.His370 ( talk) 03:35, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello! As requested by Balance person on the June 2024 Women in Green editathon event page, here is a quick 20-minute assessment of the article to help with preparation for a Good Article (GA) nomination:
The article looks fundamentally pretty good. There are certainly some prose issues which I might expect to be picked up on, but that isn't too much of a problem for GA status and should be easy enough to deal with in a review. For instance, the article is currently inconsistent about whether "black" should be capitalised or uncapitalised (per MOS:RACECAPS, either is acceptable, but we should be consistent within an article!). Another example: the paragraph beginning "Although the African-American educator..." seems very long to me, and might do better split (perhaps with a new paragraph beginning "When Greener left...")
There are a few more significant issues, though they should all be relatively easy fixes:
There is conflicting data on how many siblings she had, but most sources cite between seven and tenis not supported by either of the subsequent citations, neither of which mentions her siblings at all.
Caeciliusinhorto-public ( talk) 09:32, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Balance person ( talk · contribs) 15:15, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Mike Christie ( talk · contribs) 18:36, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
I'll review this.
Mike Christie (
talk -
contribs -
library)
18:36, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Images are appropriately tagged.
Looking at the sources:
Since the article might change if any of these have to be removed, I'll pause the review until these questions are resolved. Mike Christie ( talk - contribs - library) 19:47, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
OK, looks good. I'll do spotchecks next; footnote numbers refer to this version.
Just the one quote needed for verification.
Reading through the article:
That's everything I can see. Mike Christie ( talk - contribs - library) 18:24, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Balance person ( talk) 11:52, 8 July 2024 (UTC).