So far MOS for the lead section, layout, words to watch seem fine, but I want to read through everything a little more to make sure I haven't missed something.
Shearonink (
talk)
01:54, 11 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Her images are relevant. Maybe just a nicety, but could the captions have the dates of publication? I tried to find the artist for the last portrait but the book doesn't credit the artist who drew all the drawings of the various First Ladies, not even "portrait after painting by" or "portrait after photograph by". The First Ladies' portraits are anonymous (and, an aside, not as well-done as the Presidents' portraits...)
Shearonink (
talk)
21:35, 10 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Thanks. Yeah, that second portrait is obviously later and I assume was done off of some (unknown to us) photograph. Personally, I am always interested in where whatever materials (information and images) actually come from...
Shearonink (
talk)
16:11, 11 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
This article is looking good. I am going to go over it a few more times, to make sure I didn't miss anything that is non-GA quality. Will update the status within a day or two.
Shearonink (
talk)
16:11, 11 January 2023 (UTC)reply
So far MOS for the lead section, layout, words to watch seem fine, but I want to read through everything a little more to make sure I haven't missed something.
Shearonink (
talk)
01:54, 11 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Her images are relevant. Maybe just a nicety, but could the captions have the dates of publication? I tried to find the artist for the last portrait but the book doesn't credit the artist who drew all the drawings of the various First Ladies, not even "portrait after painting by" or "portrait after photograph by". The First Ladies' portraits are anonymous (and, an aside, not as well-done as the Presidents' portraits...)
Shearonink (
talk)
21:35, 10 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Thanks. Yeah, that second portrait is obviously later and I assume was done off of some (unknown to us) photograph. Personally, I am always interested in where whatever materials (information and images) actually come from...
Shearonink (
talk)
16:11, 11 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
This article is looking good. I am going to go over it a few more times, to make sure I didn't miss anything that is non-GA quality. Will update the status within a day or two.
Shearonink (
talk)
16:11, 11 January 2023 (UTC)reply