From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Zawed ( talk · contribs) 08:55, 26 August 2014 (UTC) reply


The ships are just about all done, let's start with the planes... Overall, this looks really good. I made a few tweaks to minimise the feedback on the text, but please check you are OK with the changes. In terms of comments, just the following:

Lead

  • this doesn't seem to read well: "...the Navy standardized on the smaller and simpler Douglas AD Skyraider." Maybe replace "standardized" with "switched to"?
  • I changed the original BTM to XBTM because there wasn't any reference to it being known as the BTM in the body of the article? The paragraph beginning "The first XBTM-1 made its..." mentions the change to AM-1 without mentioning it was originally BTM.

Footnotes

  • Something wrong with formatting of cite 23.

Bibliography

  • the Green & Pollinger and the Wilson refs don't appear to be cited.

Other stuff

Just so that people know I checked these:

  • no duplicate links
  • no disambig links
  • external links check OK
  • image tags look fine.

I'll check back in a few days. Zawed ( talk) 08:55, 26 August 2014 (UTC) reply

  • Thanks for the feedback and for the review.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 19:57, 1 September 2014 (UTC) reply
    • Always a pleasure, passing as GA. Cheers. Zawed ( talk) 08:25, 2 September 2014 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Zawed ( talk · contribs) 08:55, 26 August 2014 (UTC) reply


The ships are just about all done, let's start with the planes... Overall, this looks really good. I made a few tweaks to minimise the feedback on the text, but please check you are OK with the changes. In terms of comments, just the following:

Lead

  • this doesn't seem to read well: "...the Navy standardized on the smaller and simpler Douglas AD Skyraider." Maybe replace "standardized" with "switched to"?
  • I changed the original BTM to XBTM because there wasn't any reference to it being known as the BTM in the body of the article? The paragraph beginning "The first XBTM-1 made its..." mentions the change to AM-1 without mentioning it was originally BTM.

Footnotes

  • Something wrong with formatting of cite 23.

Bibliography

  • the Green & Pollinger and the Wilson refs don't appear to be cited.

Other stuff

Just so that people know I checked these:

  • no duplicate links
  • no disambig links
  • external links check OK
  • image tags look fine.

I'll check back in a few days. Zawed ( talk) 08:55, 26 August 2014 (UTC) reply

  • Thanks for the feedback and for the review.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 19:57, 1 September 2014 (UTC) reply
    • Always a pleasure, passing as GA. Cheers. Zawed ( talk) 08:25, 2 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook