This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Marry-your-rapist law article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been
designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Marry-your-rapist law. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Marry-your-rapist law at the Reference desk. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
I restored the entry on France per this HRW source that states that France repealed its marry-your-rapist law in 1994.
Removed the following accompanying text from the wiki article for now:
Al-Andalusi ( talk) 21:29, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Or "the submissive" ("the unwillingly submissive," to be specific) Зенитная Самоходная Установка ( talk) 00:50, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
it seems like the Bible just doesn't care much about whether sex was consensual or rape. Its main concern was with preventing harlotry and adultery. I.e. a woman was supposed to only have sexual relations with one man her whole life unless he died and she remarried. At any rate, the father was entitled to the bride price for his daughter whether her virginity was taken consensually or by rape. Зенитная Самоходная Установка ( talk) 00:18, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
This edit which restored much of the controversial text was also reverted. It is WP:OR and WP:SYNTH using primary sources to create a view that isn't supported.
This is why I reverted the edit and the IP needs to stop forcing WP:OR into the article. Dharmalion76 ( talk) 14:05, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
You argued over the word "indicated".
You reverted to an old version that I pointed out had a falsely cited and falsely represented its source.
No, citing a Hebrew dictionary is not original research, and the translation provided (NASB, a literal translation) agrees with the dictionary. Two authoritative sources -- a translation done by scholars, as well as a dictionary.
Exodus 22:16 is a parallel passage. If you disagree, feel free to add a "citation needed". I did NOT provide that citation. The citation you say doesn't speak about it being parallel is not intended to. It is intended to point out that the commentary explicitly states in its comments on verses 28 and 29 that the man is obligated, not given an option, as you keep reverting the article to claim.
Regarding it being parallel, I'll add presently the citation specifically for Constable's notes naming it as such. As if it wasn't obvious in every single Bible that provides parallel passages.
You also removed all edits when reverting back to an inaccurate revision. If you take issue with the edits, point out the issues precisely, rather than doing a sweeping reversion to a faulty article, wiping out all of the contribution since then.
So then, your complaints are false, your editing is not done with respect to the contributions made, and all citations are valid and provided.
Anything else? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.78.228.194 ( talk) 05:30, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Marry-your-rapist law article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been
designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Marry-your-rapist law. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Marry-your-rapist law at the Reference desk. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
I restored the entry on France per this HRW source that states that France repealed its marry-your-rapist law in 1994.
Removed the following accompanying text from the wiki article for now:
Al-Andalusi ( talk) 21:29, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Or "the submissive" ("the unwillingly submissive," to be specific) Зенитная Самоходная Установка ( talk) 00:50, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
it seems like the Bible just doesn't care much about whether sex was consensual or rape. Its main concern was with preventing harlotry and adultery. I.e. a woman was supposed to only have sexual relations with one man her whole life unless he died and she remarried. At any rate, the father was entitled to the bride price for his daughter whether her virginity was taken consensually or by rape. Зенитная Самоходная Установка ( talk) 00:18, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
This edit which restored much of the controversial text was also reverted. It is WP:OR and WP:SYNTH using primary sources to create a view that isn't supported.
This is why I reverted the edit and the IP needs to stop forcing WP:OR into the article. Dharmalion76 ( talk) 14:05, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
You argued over the word "indicated".
You reverted to an old version that I pointed out had a falsely cited and falsely represented its source.
No, citing a Hebrew dictionary is not original research, and the translation provided (NASB, a literal translation) agrees with the dictionary. Two authoritative sources -- a translation done by scholars, as well as a dictionary.
Exodus 22:16 is a parallel passage. If you disagree, feel free to add a "citation needed". I did NOT provide that citation. The citation you say doesn't speak about it being parallel is not intended to. It is intended to point out that the commentary explicitly states in its comments on verses 28 and 29 that the man is obligated, not given an option, as you keep reverting the article to claim.
Regarding it being parallel, I'll add presently the citation specifically for Constable's notes naming it as such. As if it wasn't obvious in every single Bible that provides parallel passages.
You also removed all edits when reverting back to an inaccurate revision. If you take issue with the edits, point out the issues precisely, rather than doing a sweeping reversion to a faulty article, wiping out all of the contribution since then.
So then, your complaints are false, your editing is not done with respect to the contributions made, and all citations are valid and provided.
Anything else? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.78.228.194 ( talk) 05:30, 2 October 2019 (UTC)