This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Where does the claim that notes & errata is no longer published come from? Do they mean no longer in the print version? Online copy still exists. -- nae' blis 23:06, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Is not the word "iconoclastic" a little too harsh for an article that isn't supposed to be biased? This is supposed to be an article written in a formal, OBJECTIVE tone, and instead, there are negative phrases all over the place. Maybe the writers need to look up "objective", "formal tone" and "iconoclastic" before continuing the article. Look them up quickly, here. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Absurdliaisons ( talk • contribs).
One aspect not covered in this wiki entry is the fact that Mark Morford is a huge fucking douchebag. Should this be a new "Douchebag" section, or can it just go into the existing body text? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.231.60.236 ( talk) 19:08, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
This article is a little too heavy on descriptions of what his writing is like, with not enough basic information (early life? birthdate and birthplace?) about the man himself. Moncrief ( talk) 13:46, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Please stop adding the descriptor "Marxist" to this person's article. Marxists are conscientious social critics and historians. They do not believe, as Morford does (for example) that there are energy vampires whose "cords" reach through facebook to drain the life from you. 70.143.67.217 ( talk) 16:02, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mark Morford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:44, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Where does the claim that notes & errata is no longer published come from? Do they mean no longer in the print version? Online copy still exists. -- nae' blis 23:06, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Is not the word "iconoclastic" a little too harsh for an article that isn't supposed to be biased? This is supposed to be an article written in a formal, OBJECTIVE tone, and instead, there are negative phrases all over the place. Maybe the writers need to look up "objective", "formal tone" and "iconoclastic" before continuing the article. Look them up quickly, here. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Absurdliaisons ( talk • contribs).
One aspect not covered in this wiki entry is the fact that Mark Morford is a huge fucking douchebag. Should this be a new "Douchebag" section, or can it just go into the existing body text? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.231.60.236 ( talk) 19:08, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
This article is a little too heavy on descriptions of what his writing is like, with not enough basic information (early life? birthdate and birthplace?) about the man himself. Moncrief ( talk) 13:46, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Please stop adding the descriptor "Marxist" to this person's article. Marxists are conscientious social critics and historians. They do not believe, as Morford does (for example) that there are energy vampires whose "cords" reach through facebook to drain the life from you. 70.143.67.217 ( talk) 16:02, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mark Morford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:44, 26 December 2017 (UTC)