GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Lizzy150 ( talk · contribs) 21:50, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello @ Willbb234:
I'll be doing a review of this article.. should be a good read! I've skimmed half of it for now and don't see any major issues. Here's my comments so far:
Comment I thought the same, but was hesitant as I have seen empty sections like this before. Will add to it though. Thanks, Willbb234 Talk (please {{ ping}} me in replies) 21:58, 25 November 2019 (UTC) Will come back to the rest! Thanks, Lizzy ( talk 21:50, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Sorry for the wait. I didn't actually write most of this article, but I'll try my best to fix the issues and discuss with you. Next to the comment, I'll comment. Cheers, Willbb234 Talk (please {{ ping}} me in replies) 21:51, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
@ Lizzy150: Hi there, just wandering if you are planning on continuing this review. It's been nearly a month. Thanks, Willbb234 Talk (please {{ ping}} me in replies) 20:13, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
@ Willbb234: Thanks for prodding me to review this. I had some review notes on my PC which I was supposed to add. Here’s the rest of my review. With some fine-tuning, I think it will eventually pass GA requirements.
Lead section
Early life
2005-2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
Riding style
General points:
Overall, these are the main issues that need fixing. There’s a couple of things that I can do later as well. I hope this was useful. Happy Christmas! Just Lizzy( talk) 14:52, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
@ Lizzy150: hi there. I have completed all of the above. Thanks, Willbb234 Talk (please {{ ping}} me in replies) 17:09, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
@ Willbb234: Thanks for making all the changes / and defending the ones you didn't do. I have read the article and made some minor changes myself.
PROSE: Overall, this was good and easy to read. Going forward, I'd try to keep paragraphs consistent and avoid too many short ones. I've cleaned up most of them for now. Also, try to use different pronouns, eg. 'The cyclist did this' rather than 'Cavendish did this'. There were hundreds of 'Cavendish' throughout the article, so I've swapped some to 'The cyclist' instead.
SOURCES: Well referenced and sufficient citations. Going forward, add archive links to web URLs (boring task, I know). No copyright violations detected.
COVERAGE: Stays focused and on-topic.
NEUTRAL/STABLE: Yes
ILLUSTRATED: Yes plenty of images, properly tagged with captions. Going forward, try to keep images spaced out and in chronological order of article.
Nothing else concerns me with this article, so I'm passing now! One thing - the 'Career achievements' section is still blank. I'd recommend you add a few sentences there. Thanks, Just Lizzy( talk) 20:54, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Lizzy150 ( talk · contribs) 21:50, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello @ Willbb234:
I'll be doing a review of this article.. should be a good read! I've skimmed half of it for now and don't see any major issues. Here's my comments so far:
Comment I thought the same, but was hesitant as I have seen empty sections like this before. Will add to it though. Thanks, Willbb234 Talk (please {{ ping}} me in replies) 21:58, 25 November 2019 (UTC) Will come back to the rest! Thanks, Lizzy ( talk 21:50, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Sorry for the wait. I didn't actually write most of this article, but I'll try my best to fix the issues and discuss with you. Next to the comment, I'll comment. Cheers, Willbb234 Talk (please {{ ping}} me in replies) 21:51, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
@ Lizzy150: Hi there, just wandering if you are planning on continuing this review. It's been nearly a month. Thanks, Willbb234 Talk (please {{ ping}} me in replies) 20:13, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
@ Willbb234: Thanks for prodding me to review this. I had some review notes on my PC which I was supposed to add. Here’s the rest of my review. With some fine-tuning, I think it will eventually pass GA requirements.
Lead section
Early life
2005-2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
Riding style
General points:
Overall, these are the main issues that need fixing. There’s a couple of things that I can do later as well. I hope this was useful. Happy Christmas! Just Lizzy( talk) 14:52, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
@ Lizzy150: hi there. I have completed all of the above. Thanks, Willbb234 Talk (please {{ ping}} me in replies) 17:09, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
@ Willbb234: Thanks for making all the changes / and defending the ones you didn't do. I have read the article and made some minor changes myself.
PROSE: Overall, this was good and easy to read. Going forward, I'd try to keep paragraphs consistent and avoid too many short ones. I've cleaned up most of them for now. Also, try to use different pronouns, eg. 'The cyclist did this' rather than 'Cavendish did this'. There were hundreds of 'Cavendish' throughout the article, so I've swapped some to 'The cyclist' instead.
SOURCES: Well referenced and sufficient citations. Going forward, add archive links to web URLs (boring task, I know). No copyright violations detected.
COVERAGE: Stays focused and on-topic.
NEUTRAL/STABLE: Yes
ILLUSTRATED: Yes plenty of images, properly tagged with captions. Going forward, try to keep images spaced out and in chronological order of article.
Nothing else concerns me with this article, so I'm passing now! One thing - the 'Career achievements' section is still blank. I'd recommend you add a few sentences there. Thanks, Just Lizzy( talk) 20:54, 21 January 2020 (UTC)