While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 23:25, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Image:MarionPruettcrop.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 07:10, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Marion Albert Pruett. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:53, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Why is this article a member of the Organized Crime WikiProject? There is nothing in the article about the reasons for the subject being associated with organized crime. Killing someone who is associated with organized crime and then being put into a witness protection program for giving evidence doesn't associate the subject of this article with organized crime, especially when the article doesn't explain the circumstances of the prison murder, which the subject subsequently alleged he committed, despite contradicting his evidence given in court. The article is substantially incomplete, as no explanation is given about why the subject was even in prison. Since the subject is deceased, neither WP:BLP nor WP:BDP should apply to the subject themselves, although it might apply to others mentioned in the article. As far as I can tell, MOS:BIO should apply. While I do not expect completeness, I do expect sufficient information to make an assessment for a WikiProject. Can someone justify why I should not remove the Organized Crime banner? - Cameron Dewe ( talk) 03:15, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 23:25, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Image:MarionPruettcrop.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 07:10, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Marion Albert Pruett. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:53, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Why is this article a member of the Organized Crime WikiProject? There is nothing in the article about the reasons for the subject being associated with organized crime. Killing someone who is associated with organized crime and then being put into a witness protection program for giving evidence doesn't associate the subject of this article with organized crime, especially when the article doesn't explain the circumstances of the prison murder, which the subject subsequently alleged he committed, despite contradicting his evidence given in court. The article is substantially incomplete, as no explanation is given about why the subject was even in prison. Since the subject is deceased, neither WP:BLP nor WP:BDP should apply to the subject themselves, although it might apply to others mentioned in the article. As far as I can tell, MOS:BIO should apply. While I do not expect completeness, I do expect sufficient information to make an assessment for a WikiProject. Can someone justify why I should not remove the Organized Crime banner? - Cameron Dewe ( talk) 03:15, 9 October 2021 (UTC)