A quick scan shows me a very well-written and comprehensive article. I'm fairly certain it will pass, but I'll analyze the article deeper and find errors in need of correction. Good job to all editors involved in writing this article! -- haha169 ( talk) 22:17, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
Things to fix:
Praise:
Just fix those problems, and I think it will be ready to pass GAN. Great organization, satisfactory prose, and great in following WP:NPOV. -- haha169 ( talk) 16:10, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of July 16, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:
Good job. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— haha169 ( talk) 15:56, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
A quick scan shows me a very well-written and comprehensive article. I'm fairly certain it will pass, but I'll analyze the article deeper and find errors in need of correction. Good job to all editors involved in writing this article! -- haha169 ( talk) 22:17, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
Things to fix:
Praise:
Just fix those problems, and I think it will be ready to pass GAN. Great organization, satisfactory prose, and great in following WP:NPOV. -- haha169 ( talk) 16:10, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of July 16, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:
Good job. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— haha169 ( talk) 15:56, 16 July 2008 (UTC)