This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Okay... I'm confused.
I wrote what was appearing on this page at 17 Feb 2010, 12:24GMT, but under a different title.
My page, titled Marie_and_Emile_Taquet-Martens re-emerged named "Marie_and_Emile_Taquet-Martens".
A am guessing... no citations were given for the sources prompting the name change... that Marie remarried at some stage.
I would suggest that Emile Taquet, as I believe his name to be, shouldn't be saddled with the name of his wife's second husband.
Furthermore, I find that the Wikipedia seach tool is little frail, and imagine that more people will search for this person under "Taquet" than under the longer version.
So I would propose that the article be reverted to the original name, unless documentation can be found to show that Emile was Emile Martens.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Okay... I'm confused.
I wrote what was appearing on this page at 17 Feb 2010, 12:24GMT, but under a different title.
My page, titled Marie_and_Emile_Taquet-Martens re-emerged named "Marie_and_Emile_Taquet-Martens".
A am guessing... no citations were given for the sources prompting the name change... that Marie remarried at some stage.
I would suggest that Emile Taquet, as I believe his name to be, shouldn't be saddled with the name of his wife's second husband.
Furthermore, I find that the Wikipedia seach tool is little frail, and imagine that more people will search for this person under "Taquet" than under the longer version.
So I would propose that the article be reverted to the original name, unless documentation can be found to show that Emile was Emile Martens.