![]() | Maribojoc Church has been listed as one of the
Art and architecture good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: October 7, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | Maribojoc Church received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Maribojoc Church appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 6 October 2014 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: CaroleHenson ( talk · contribs) 23:03, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I will start the review today and finish it within the next couple of days.--
CaroleHenson (
talk)
23:03, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
The article is well-written and paraphrased, with use of good-reliable sources. There are a few cases where there are citations missing and one source to improve, but the rest of the sources are great! It follows Manual of Style guidelines for sections, layout, etc. The article is stable. It covers the subject well, without going into unnecessary detail. It's told from a neutral point of view. The images are helpful to better know the now destroyed building. The images have suitable captions and have the appropriate licensing tags in commons.
Great article! I've really enjoyed reading it. I'll put the article on hold for seven days to allow you time to respond to the comments and make any necessary edits.-- CaroleHenson ( talk) 01:57, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
Article contains attributions to Murillo Velarde. However his work was written in 1749, and attribution is for a building complated a century and a half later. Needs thinking about. Unbuttered parsnip ( talk) mytime= Fri 11:33, wikitime= 03:33, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
There were a number of recent changes - some of which were unnecessary and some of which were not the right approach:
Rather than redo the Good article review, it was better to revert to the earlier version that used capitalization / italics, etc. based upon related Wikipedia article content (e.g. Neo-gothic, Catholic Church, etc.)edit, and will look for helpful copy edits to return.-- CaroleHenson ( talk) 23:23, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Maribojoc Church. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:44, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Perhaps someone can update this article. The church has been restored. Sanglahi86 ( talk) 08:20, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
![]() | Maribojoc Church has been listed as one of the
Art and architecture good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: October 7, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | Maribojoc Church received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Maribojoc Church appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 6 October 2014 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: CaroleHenson ( talk · contribs) 23:03, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I will start the review today and finish it within the next couple of days.--
CaroleHenson (
talk)
23:03, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
The article is well-written and paraphrased, with use of good-reliable sources. There are a few cases where there are citations missing and one source to improve, but the rest of the sources are great! It follows Manual of Style guidelines for sections, layout, etc. The article is stable. It covers the subject well, without going into unnecessary detail. It's told from a neutral point of view. The images are helpful to better know the now destroyed building. The images have suitable captions and have the appropriate licensing tags in commons.
Great article! I've really enjoyed reading it. I'll put the article on hold for seven days to allow you time to respond to the comments and make any necessary edits.-- CaroleHenson ( talk) 01:57, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
Article contains attributions to Murillo Velarde. However his work was written in 1749, and attribution is for a building complated a century and a half later. Needs thinking about. Unbuttered parsnip ( talk) mytime= Fri 11:33, wikitime= 03:33, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
There were a number of recent changes - some of which were unnecessary and some of which were not the right approach:
Rather than redo the Good article review, it was better to revert to the earlier version that used capitalization / italics, etc. based upon related Wikipedia article content (e.g. Neo-gothic, Catholic Church, etc.)edit, and will look for helpful copy edits to return.-- CaroleHenson ( talk) 23:23, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Maribojoc Church. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:44, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Perhaps someone can update this article. The church has been restored. Sanglahi86 ( talk) 08:20, 19 December 2022 (UTC)