![]() | Mariano Moreno was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Scampioen ( talk) 20:23, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
You've done a really nice job researching and writing the article, but i feel the first half needs more attention on the style and grammar.
-Overall, i think the article needs a cleanup of prose: i feel some sentences just don't work (like "Mariano Moreno would have been part of the new Junta. They were defeated ..." : The sentence of him being a part of the new junta stands on its own and doesn't really fit into the narrative.). The flow of the first half of the article isn't the best and may need some cleanup. However, the flow of the article improves a lot with the section 'death' and onwards.
-In the part of the operations plan you change from past to present tense quite often. I guess it's better kept al in the past tense?
On a different note, this is my first review. If anyone else more experienced wants to add something or feels that i have made a mistake, don't hesitate to do so.
There are way too many {{citation needed}}
tags on this article for it to meet GA requirements.
Cambalachero, I see you nominated this 11 years ago and you are still active. Is that something that you could possibly look into? Much appreciated.
Schwede
66
05:55, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Article has 10 citation needed tags. Looks good overall, so should be relatively easy to save for somebody knowledgeable. —Femke 🐦 ( talk) 20:00, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
![]() | Mariano Moreno was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Scampioen ( talk) 20:23, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
You've done a really nice job researching and writing the article, but i feel the first half needs more attention on the style and grammar.
-Overall, i think the article needs a cleanup of prose: i feel some sentences just don't work (like "Mariano Moreno would have been part of the new Junta. They were defeated ..." : The sentence of him being a part of the new junta stands on its own and doesn't really fit into the narrative.). The flow of the first half of the article isn't the best and may need some cleanup. However, the flow of the article improves a lot with the section 'death' and onwards.
-In the part of the operations plan you change from past to present tense quite often. I guess it's better kept al in the past tense?
On a different note, this is my first review. If anyone else more experienced wants to add something or feels that i have made a mistake, don't hesitate to do so.
There are way too many {{citation needed}}
tags on this article for it to meet GA requirements.
Cambalachero, I see you nominated this 11 years ago and you are still active. Is that something that you could possibly look into? Much appreciated.
Schwede
66
05:55, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Article has 10 citation needed tags. Looks good overall, so should be relatively easy to save for somebody knowledgeable. —Femke 🐦 ( talk) 20:00, 3 February 2023 (UTC)