The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Adog ( talk · contribs) 05:23, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
I will claim this song article. As part of my reviews of songs, I will give you a personal review of the song that has no bearing on the article GA review itself. I will fully review this article either by Monday, August 21 or Tuesday, August 22. Adog ( Talk・ Cont) 05:23, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Writing for Wikipedia, a dog gave an introduction to his review, commentating, "...I swear I heard of this song befo- Oh, oh god I have. From Mr. ' Another One'". The dog quickly had relief after listening to the song, stating "oh, how this song is the superior version from Mr. Another One. The rock band Santana hit it off with R&B specialist Product G&B with a fantastic guitar riff beat fully fusing rock and R&B vocals into a hip-hop jam" further equating that "Rock + R&B = Hip Hop? The world works wonders". The dog finished his review, stating, the music video was a nice touch to the festive atmosphere that Maria Maria invokes, with the dog wishing for Maria to find her ending in a happy world. Adog ( Talk・ Cont) 03:54, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
The following are suggestions and comments worth addressing the grammar and sentence structure during my skim and full read-through of the article for the editor-at-large. If you believe a suggestion is improper, not appropriate for the text, or changes the meaning of the passage, please feel free to disregard with a explanation:
At the 2000 Grammy Awards, the song won for Best Pop Performance by a Duo or Group with Vocals, before it experienced commercial success.I would omit "for" and remove the comma after "Vocals".
worldwide?
ten weeks?
The song's success has inspired numerous sampling usages plus a restaurant chain named after the track.Comma before "plus".
... Jean said that he came up with the song's composition by reworking by a 1993 Wu-Tang Clan song titled ...Remove "by" as left-over word to omit.
Jean and Duplessis produced "Maria Maria" while the Product G&B provide the lead vocals"provide" to "provided".
The song's lyrics ...?
... as does Jean, who came up with his intermittent lyrics by freestyling"came up with" to simply "made"?
It featured Santana ...
"Maria Maria" became such a success that Carlos Santana worked together with chef Roberto Santibañez and California business Dudum Sports and Entertainment to open a restaurant chain named after the songOmit "together" here as an extra word?
The menu, created by Santibañez, contains traditional Mexican food with alterations, including mushroom fajitas ...
Five artists were recruited to design the restaurants' decorIt might be worth to know what kind of artists these were. I presume visual artists or graphic designers or painters rather than musical artists.
Santana, who co-signed the track, ...Possible missing word "to" before "the".
The skim and full-read-through were good in the presentation of the content. Onto the spot checks and final comments. Adog ( Talk・ Cont) 03:54, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Spot checks: In terms of spot checks, this article was good. Although, I want to point out that in "Legacy", the first paragraph is one source. Normally, not a problem; however, this is from the "the comprehensive santana resource" which is a little bit...eh? Is there another source that could be placed with this one to authenticate the paragraph better? It might seem too narrow of interest for a general audience and be only of interest for Santana fans. Adog ( Talk・ Cont) 19:55, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
The article is well written, with some minor concerns for the editor to possibly fix. The article works with a general manual of style for songs. The article has a list of reliable sources and the reference list is pretty spot on with either minor changes in format or questions on reliability. Spot checks were all good on this one, outside of a minor problem with the "Official Sanatana" source. Earwig looks good in terms of close paraphrasing, copyright, or plagiarism. Adog ( Talk・ Cont) 19:55, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
The article is broad in scope, covering several topics relating to the song with a very good focus on its subject matter. The article is neutral towards its subject, with no outlying problems. Adog ( Talk・ Cont) 19:55, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
The article has a host of images, visuals, or audible features that are relevant to the work of the song, and whose paperwork seems to be in order. The article is stable, with no ongoing or active edit conflicts. Adog ( Talk・ Cont) 03:54, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Adog ( talk · contribs) 05:23, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
I will claim this song article. As part of my reviews of songs, I will give you a personal review of the song that has no bearing on the article GA review itself. I will fully review this article either by Monday, August 21 or Tuesday, August 22. Adog ( Talk・ Cont) 05:23, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Writing for Wikipedia, a dog gave an introduction to his review, commentating, "...I swear I heard of this song befo- Oh, oh god I have. From Mr. ' Another One'". The dog quickly had relief after listening to the song, stating "oh, how this song is the superior version from Mr. Another One. The rock band Santana hit it off with R&B specialist Product G&B with a fantastic guitar riff beat fully fusing rock and R&B vocals into a hip-hop jam" further equating that "Rock + R&B = Hip Hop? The world works wonders". The dog finished his review, stating, the music video was a nice touch to the festive atmosphere that Maria Maria invokes, with the dog wishing for Maria to find her ending in a happy world. Adog ( Talk・ Cont) 03:54, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
The following are suggestions and comments worth addressing the grammar and sentence structure during my skim and full read-through of the article for the editor-at-large. If you believe a suggestion is improper, not appropriate for the text, or changes the meaning of the passage, please feel free to disregard with a explanation:
At the 2000 Grammy Awards, the song won for Best Pop Performance by a Duo or Group with Vocals, before it experienced commercial success.I would omit "for" and remove the comma after "Vocals".
worldwide?
ten weeks?
The song's success has inspired numerous sampling usages plus a restaurant chain named after the track.Comma before "plus".
... Jean said that he came up with the song's composition by reworking by a 1993 Wu-Tang Clan song titled ...Remove "by" as left-over word to omit.
Jean and Duplessis produced "Maria Maria" while the Product G&B provide the lead vocals"provide" to "provided".
The song's lyrics ...?
... as does Jean, who came up with his intermittent lyrics by freestyling"came up with" to simply "made"?
It featured Santana ...
"Maria Maria" became such a success that Carlos Santana worked together with chef Roberto Santibañez and California business Dudum Sports and Entertainment to open a restaurant chain named after the songOmit "together" here as an extra word?
The menu, created by Santibañez, contains traditional Mexican food with alterations, including mushroom fajitas ...
Five artists were recruited to design the restaurants' decorIt might be worth to know what kind of artists these were. I presume visual artists or graphic designers or painters rather than musical artists.
Santana, who co-signed the track, ...Possible missing word "to" before "the".
The skim and full-read-through were good in the presentation of the content. Onto the spot checks and final comments. Adog ( Talk・ Cont) 03:54, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Spot checks: In terms of spot checks, this article was good. Although, I want to point out that in "Legacy", the first paragraph is one source. Normally, not a problem; however, this is from the "the comprehensive santana resource" which is a little bit...eh? Is there another source that could be placed with this one to authenticate the paragraph better? It might seem too narrow of interest for a general audience and be only of interest for Santana fans. Adog ( Talk・ Cont) 19:55, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
The article is well written, with some minor concerns for the editor to possibly fix. The article works with a general manual of style for songs. The article has a list of reliable sources and the reference list is pretty spot on with either minor changes in format or questions on reliability. Spot checks were all good on this one, outside of a minor problem with the "Official Sanatana" source. Earwig looks good in terms of close paraphrasing, copyright, or plagiarism. Adog ( Talk・ Cont) 19:55, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
The article is broad in scope, covering several topics relating to the song with a very good focus on its subject matter. The article is neutral towards its subject, with no outlying problems. Adog ( Talk・ Cont) 19:55, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
The article has a host of images, visuals, or audible features that are relevant to the work of the song, and whose paperwork seems to be in order. The article is stable, with no ongoing or active edit conflicts. Adog ( Talk・ Cont) 03:54, 23 August 2023 (UTC)