This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
The article says there is no evidence that Margaret Gage was an informer for the rebels, and the claim comes from one book written two hundred thirty years after the events. Why is this claim in the article at all? The Gages had children together after they left America, so their marriage was evidently solid. The "popular culture" section here is even worse, being unsourced and making a further claim with no proof. Under the idea of WP:Bold, I will remove them and see what happens. But a revert should have some basis better than "Someone says it's true."
Princetoniac (
talk) 21:23, 22 September 2016 (UTC)reply
I came here to query the claim, too. As currently written, the section on whether or not she's a spy looks like it's fleshed out and well sourced, but that's because most of it is actually just detailing uncontroversial historical fact (the details of the Lexington and Concorde expedition) or trying to turn such fact into innuendo (that Gage sent his wife home after the siege of Boston began). It's not clear that there's really any citation to the claim itself that she might have been a Patriot spy. If one of the cited works does say "Margaret Gage was (or might have been) a Patriot spy", that should be made clearer in the article; if it doesn't, the section should probably be junked. IMHO.
Binabik80 (
talk) 17:43, 13 October 2019 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
The article says there is no evidence that Margaret Gage was an informer for the rebels, and the claim comes from one book written two hundred thirty years after the events. Why is this claim in the article at all? The Gages had children together after they left America, so their marriage was evidently solid. The "popular culture" section here is even worse, being unsourced and making a further claim with no proof. Under the idea of WP:Bold, I will remove them and see what happens. But a revert should have some basis better than "Someone says it's true."
Princetoniac (
talk) 21:23, 22 September 2016 (UTC)reply
I came here to query the claim, too. As currently written, the section on whether or not she's a spy looks like it's fleshed out and well sourced, but that's because most of it is actually just detailing uncontroversial historical fact (the details of the Lexington and Concorde expedition) or trying to turn such fact into innuendo (that Gage sent his wife home after the siege of Boston began). It's not clear that there's really any citation to the claim itself that she might have been a Patriot spy. If one of the cited works does say "Margaret Gage was (or might have been) a Patriot spy", that should be made clearer in the article; if it doesn't, the section should probably be junked. IMHO.
Binabik80 (
talk) 17:43, 13 October 2019 (UTC)reply