From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Nominator: TheNuggeteer ( talk · contribs) 08:50, 5 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Reviewer: Arconning ( talk · contribs) 07:11, 9 July 2024 (UTC) reply


I will be reviewing this, comments will probably be finished in the next 72 hours! Arconning ( talk) 07:11, 9 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Wikipedia:QUICKFAIL. Article is too far from GA standard:

  1. The lead does not contain information outside the subject's name, birthdate, and occupation, also a singular sentence.
  2. The body is more-or-less a non-prose-like body, with random factoids of information briefly summarizing quick information about the subject's stances on issues.
  3. Dating systems are inconsistent, with the infobox using d/m/y while some of the references used have y/m/d. MOS:DATEUNIFY
  4. References such as "Rappler" and "Inquirer" are not formatted properly, despite being stylized as all capitals. Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Capital letters#All caps and small caps

I am quickfailing as the article still has a long way to go to meet criteria 1a, 1b, and 3a. Hope you can soon re-nominate this once it's better. :)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Nominator: TheNuggeteer ( talk · contribs) 08:50, 5 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Reviewer: Arconning ( talk · contribs) 07:11, 9 July 2024 (UTC) reply


I will be reviewing this, comments will probably be finished in the next 72 hours! Arconning ( talk) 07:11, 9 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Wikipedia:QUICKFAIL. Article is too far from GA standard:

  1. The lead does not contain information outside the subject's name, birthdate, and occupation, also a singular sentence.
  2. The body is more-or-less a non-prose-like body, with random factoids of information briefly summarizing quick information about the subject's stances on issues.
  3. Dating systems are inconsistent, with the infobox using d/m/y while some of the references used have y/m/d. MOS:DATEUNIFY
  4. References such as "Rappler" and "Inquirer" are not formatted properly, despite being stylized as all capitals. Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Capital letters#All caps and small caps

I am quickfailing as the article still has a long way to go to meet criteria 1a, 1b, and 3a. Hope you can soon re-nominate this once it's better. :)


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook