![]() | The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to
India,
Pakistan, and
Afghanistan, which has been
designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
@Hookahlove Stop this disruptive editing, you are removing citations and well sourced material. Discuss before adding or removing next time. Shimlaites ( talk) 09:43, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Look at the references that have been pointed out. The non-neutral version by Shimlaites shows extreme bias and neglects historical facts. In reality, the peace agreement (sometimes called Treaty of Gajendragadh) had losses and gains on both sides. You can not neglect Mysore victories on the battle. The neutral version is more academic. Hookahlove ( talk) 07:39, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
@ Shimlaites and Hookahlove: You have been edit warring between the two of you for done days now, and with the requests at RFPP and ANI, it is verging on disruption. You are clearly on disagreement over a form of words. Can I suggest, as a way of moving forward, we divide it into two portions: first, lay out the facts as the reliable sources present them, over which you both agree; and then, discuss how you would both feel comfortable describing them. Can you do this, did you think? â O Fortuna velut luna 08:14, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
@Hookahlove Stop adding your POV And your bias. You are removing sourced material and their citations. Discuss here, do not engage in blind reverts and discuss first. Shimlaites ( talk) 09:10, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
User:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi, Shimlaites, Lectonar, the Shimlaites version is biased and unfair. If you look at it, you will see that he only includes Maratha gains and whimsically changed the dates from June, 1787 [1] to April 1787 [2], which shows bias. If you look at the version I copied, it gives accurate information, showing the accurate figures with references and showing gains and losses on both sides. Hookahlove ( talk) 03:26, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
Wrong information given in first para , tipu lost the war . Tipu paid tribute after defeat against Martha's , Victorious dosen't pay tribute to defeated party completely misleading information â Preceding unsigned comment added by Jobindox ( talk ⢠contribs) 07:54, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
"Quite unexpectedly a settlement was reached in March 1787 at Gajendragarh between Tipu and the Marathas. This volte face is explained by the fact that the fear of British intervention lurked more in Tipuâs mind than the hostility of the Marathas, and he naturally desired to compromise with the latter. By this treaty the Marathas regained possession of Badami, Nargund and Kittur"So the result should be stalemate or peace treaty. The first comment on this thread contains original research. Imperial [AFCND] 15:53, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
This is strictly about the Mysore vs Maratha war, the extended date till 1799 includes the Fourth Anglo-Mysore War in which Marathas just supported the British, but that was mainly between Britain and Mysore. However the war between Mysore and Marathas alone happened till 1787, and this article refers to the war between them alone!! Dilbaggg ( talk) 13:35, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
![]() | The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to
India,
Pakistan, and
Afghanistan, which has been
designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
@Hookahlove Stop this disruptive editing, you are removing citations and well sourced material. Discuss before adding or removing next time. Shimlaites ( talk) 09:43, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Look at the references that have been pointed out. The non-neutral version by Shimlaites shows extreme bias and neglects historical facts. In reality, the peace agreement (sometimes called Treaty of Gajendragadh) had losses and gains on both sides. You can not neglect Mysore victories on the battle. The neutral version is more academic. Hookahlove ( talk) 07:39, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
@ Shimlaites and Hookahlove: You have been edit warring between the two of you for done days now, and with the requests at RFPP and ANI, it is verging on disruption. You are clearly on disagreement over a form of words. Can I suggest, as a way of moving forward, we divide it into two portions: first, lay out the facts as the reliable sources present them, over which you both agree; and then, discuss how you would both feel comfortable describing them. Can you do this, did you think? â O Fortuna velut luna 08:14, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
@Hookahlove Stop adding your POV And your bias. You are removing sourced material and their citations. Discuss here, do not engage in blind reverts and discuss first. Shimlaites ( talk) 09:10, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
User:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi, Shimlaites, Lectonar, the Shimlaites version is biased and unfair. If you look at it, you will see that he only includes Maratha gains and whimsically changed the dates from June, 1787 [1] to April 1787 [2], which shows bias. If you look at the version I copied, it gives accurate information, showing the accurate figures with references and showing gains and losses on both sides. Hookahlove ( talk) 03:26, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
Wrong information given in first para , tipu lost the war . Tipu paid tribute after defeat against Martha's , Victorious dosen't pay tribute to defeated party completely misleading information â Preceding unsigned comment added by Jobindox ( talk ⢠contribs) 07:54, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
"Quite unexpectedly a settlement was reached in March 1787 at Gajendragarh between Tipu and the Marathas. This volte face is explained by the fact that the fear of British intervention lurked more in Tipuâs mind than the hostility of the Marathas, and he naturally desired to compromise with the latter. By this treaty the Marathas regained possession of Badami, Nargund and Kittur"So the result should be stalemate or peace treaty. The first comment on this thread contains original research. Imperial [AFCND] 15:53, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
This is strictly about the Mysore vs Maratha war, the extended date till 1799 includes the Fourth Anglo-Mysore War in which Marathas just supported the British, but that was mainly between Britain and Mysore. However the war between Mysore and Marathas alone happened till 1787, and this article refers to the war between them alone!! Dilbaggg ( talk) 13:35, 9 August 2023 (UTC)