This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The idea of renumbering MB 75 as MB 29 to match I-29 either needs a reputable source (i.e. public documents/media, not roadgeek discussion threads), or it needs to be deleted as wild speculation. VT hawkeye talk to me 03:48, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
I am considering creating a set of Manitoba highway shield images for use in Wikipedia (such as to use in this and the I-29 article). However, it has come to my attention that the provincial wordmark and buffalo logo are used on the shields, in which case they'd be protected graphics. Is this true? If so, what are the restrictions on the use of the logo? Would using a low-res shield picture be a valid "logo" picture? -- WhosAsking 15:22, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The idea of renumbering MB 75 as MB 29 to match I-29 either needs a reputable source (i.e. public documents/media, not roadgeek discussion threads), or it needs to be deleted as wild speculation. VT hawkeye talk to me 03:48, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
I am considering creating a set of Manitoba highway shield images for use in Wikipedia (such as to use in this and the I-29 article). However, it has come to my attention that the provincial wordmark and buffalo logo are used on the shields, in which case they'd be protected graphics. Is this true? If so, what are the restrictions on the use of the logo? Would using a low-res shield picture be a valid "logo" picture? -- WhosAsking 15:22, 7 August 2006 (UTC)