This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The two books used primarily for references are pop psychology books. They are not research-based. Nor do they reflect the opinion of academic and scientific psychology. The article does not fulfill WP:V and WP:RS. Also, the See also section is too long and is misleading as it contains many unrelated or only peripherally related links. Regards, — mattisse ( Talk) 15:23, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi, There was information where the citation was needed, so I input the citation for you. More reliable references are needed in the development of expanding the scope of this article. Possibly including sections on how psychological manipulation is used in society from a normal standpoint. Psychological manipulation when pertaining to advertising, politics,etc. Lastly, under Antisocial, borderline and narcissistic personality disorders header there is a reference to the DSM-IV-TR, consider updating that information with the DSM-5. Melissa Edwards ( talk) 06:08, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
This article describes (quite well) the techniques used by psychological manipulators and the definition of this, but it doesn't include any information about how to counter, how to deal with, or how to treat people that are psychological manipulators. -- Waqqashanafi ( talk) 04:35, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
How to deal with psychological manipulators
Given that such a section would be most helpful - is anyone interested in writing it? For there could be advice on how to spot, deal with and counter manipulators at home, work and in government. And, if that was not enough to start with, there could also be sections on the press, TV and the internet. Might not a sub-section on the impact of blog sites (say, Giving the game away) led to a few interesting comments? 84.13.11.184 ( talk) 21:40, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
No original research or no new stuff. But what if someone is able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of dealing with psychological manipulators? 78.147.83.151 ( talk) 20:14, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I agree that if someone is willing to research reliable, published sources having a section on how to deal or work with psychological manipulators would be beneficial. Melissa Edwards ( talk) 05:54, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
It is absolutely not true. To lie you need to think very clearly that is the condition for a person to be judged not psycopath. It is logic that: to lie for manipulation you have to think clearly and very cleverly. So if someone lies to manipulate is not psycopath. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.55.155.214 ( talk) 21:10, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
Psychopaths are frivolous liars... They lie without even rethinking so they give people a perspective of what they want them to see and they are very convincing at it too and lie with so much confidence to show that what they intend on passing across is well sounded...they're not always serial killers but they're very deadly Temple007 ( talk) 21:22, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The two books used primarily for references are pop psychology books. They are not research-based. Nor do they reflect the opinion of academic and scientific psychology. The article does not fulfill WP:V and WP:RS. Also, the See also section is too long and is misleading as it contains many unrelated or only peripherally related links. Regards, — mattisse ( Talk) 15:23, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi, There was information where the citation was needed, so I input the citation for you. More reliable references are needed in the development of expanding the scope of this article. Possibly including sections on how psychological manipulation is used in society from a normal standpoint. Psychological manipulation when pertaining to advertising, politics,etc. Lastly, under Antisocial, borderline and narcissistic personality disorders header there is a reference to the DSM-IV-TR, consider updating that information with the DSM-5. Melissa Edwards ( talk) 06:08, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
This article describes (quite well) the techniques used by psychological manipulators and the definition of this, but it doesn't include any information about how to counter, how to deal with, or how to treat people that are psychological manipulators. -- Waqqashanafi ( talk) 04:35, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
How to deal with psychological manipulators
Given that such a section would be most helpful - is anyone interested in writing it? For there could be advice on how to spot, deal with and counter manipulators at home, work and in government. And, if that was not enough to start with, there could also be sections on the press, TV and the internet. Might not a sub-section on the impact of blog sites (say, Giving the game away) led to a few interesting comments? 84.13.11.184 ( talk) 21:40, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
No original research or no new stuff. But what if someone is able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of dealing with psychological manipulators? 78.147.83.151 ( talk) 20:14, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I agree that if someone is willing to research reliable, published sources having a section on how to deal or work with psychological manipulators would be beneficial. Melissa Edwards ( talk) 05:54, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
It is absolutely not true. To lie you need to think very clearly that is the condition for a person to be judged not psycopath. It is logic that: to lie for manipulation you have to think clearly and very cleverly. So if someone lies to manipulate is not psycopath. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.55.155.214 ( talk) 21:10, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
Psychopaths are frivolous liars... They lie without even rethinking so they give people a perspective of what they want them to see and they are very convincing at it too and lie with so much confidence to show that what they intend on passing across is well sounded...they're not always serial killers but they're very deadly Temple007 ( talk) 21:22, 1 November 2015 (UTC)