![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mangalwedha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:32, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
I have been attempting to improve this article, but I have very limited knowledge of Indian cuisine so with very few references I can not be sure I am preserving the intended meaning of the section as originally written. If anyone has superior knowledge or relevant references that would be greatly appreciated.-- NK1406 ( talk) 03:23, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
I noticed the demographics section for this article lists www.census2011.co.in as a reference. This site is blacklisted in Wikipedia as it is a scraper and therefore considered unreliable. After considerable effort attempting to locate Mangalwedha in the official census data I was unable to find a better reference. I am leaving the demographics section as is right now as it seems a better alternative than deleting the whole section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NK1406 ( talk • contribs) 20:16, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mangalwedha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:32, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
I have been attempting to improve this article, but I have very limited knowledge of Indian cuisine so with very few references I can not be sure I am preserving the intended meaning of the section as originally written. If anyone has superior knowledge or relevant references that would be greatly appreciated.-- NK1406 ( talk) 03:23, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
I noticed the demographics section for this article lists www.census2011.co.in as a reference. This site is blacklisted in Wikipedia as it is a scraper and therefore considered unreliable. After considerable effort attempting to locate Mangalwedha in the official census data I was unable to find a better reference. I am leaving the demographics section as is right now as it seems a better alternative than deleting the whole section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NK1406 ( talk • contribs) 20:16, 1 August 2020 (UTC)