![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Boeing 737 MAX was copied or moved into Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
This article is a mess and a majority of the listed sources are sensational articles from right after the crashes. In 2024 we know for a fact that:
It does a disservice to thousands of readers when articles are editorialized like this. People deserve the facts and most up-to-date information so they can make informed decisions. Injecting emotions and opinions into informational articles is inappropriate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/2603:6080:5A07:C24C:EC6B:E4AB:67DD:BA38 15:57, February 14, 2024
82.42.42.74 ( talk) 00:55, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
@ Marc Lacoste:: If you are rejecting a citation based solely on the domain name and not the content, I hardly find the recent revert convincing.
Current costly aircrafts have MULTIPLE Systems of Sensors to determine their speed, position and attitude. The original MCAS used ONLY ONE AoA sensor input. This FAIL-SURE logic could only be developed and approved by Retards (in rank and file and also in power/top jobs) 123.201.65.73 ( talk) 04:09, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
This article repeatedly uses the acronym EASA without anywhere defining what it means. Similarly, although the Federal Aviation Administration is mentioned by name in the second paragraph, the acronym FAA is used throughout also without definition. 130.246.57.110 ( talk) 11:44, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Link 145 is sort of broken it no longer points to the referenced document as the FAA document system was revised. I noticed this while looking for info to supplement a documentary on the 737 MAX I was watching.I do not know how to properly add a citation. Here is the link
https://drs.faa.gov/browse/excelExternalWindow/FB91ABC41EF06432862586260051E5DF.0001 Bruce A. WIlliamson ( talk) 14:45, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
The abbreviation for "angle of attack" should be consistently either AoA or AOA, but not a mixture. Wassermaus ( talk) 09:52, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Boeing 737 MAX was copied or moved into Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
This article is a mess and a majority of the listed sources are sensational articles from right after the crashes. In 2024 we know for a fact that:
It does a disservice to thousands of readers when articles are editorialized like this. People deserve the facts and most up-to-date information so they can make informed decisions. Injecting emotions and opinions into informational articles is inappropriate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/2603:6080:5A07:C24C:EC6B:E4AB:67DD:BA38 15:57, February 14, 2024
82.42.42.74 ( talk) 00:55, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
@ Marc Lacoste:: If you are rejecting a citation based solely on the domain name and not the content, I hardly find the recent revert convincing.
Current costly aircrafts have MULTIPLE Systems of Sensors to determine their speed, position and attitude. The original MCAS used ONLY ONE AoA sensor input. This FAIL-SURE logic could only be developed and approved by Retards (in rank and file and also in power/top jobs) 123.201.65.73 ( talk) 04:09, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
This article repeatedly uses the acronym EASA without anywhere defining what it means. Similarly, although the Federal Aviation Administration is mentioned by name in the second paragraph, the acronym FAA is used throughout also without definition. 130.246.57.110 ( talk) 11:44, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Link 145 is sort of broken it no longer points to the referenced document as the FAA document system was revised. I noticed this while looking for info to supplement a documentary on the 737 MAX I was watching.I do not know how to properly add a citation. Here is the link
https://drs.faa.gov/browse/excelExternalWindow/FB91ABC41EF06432862586260051E5DF.0001 Bruce A. WIlliamson ( talk) 14:45, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
The abbreviation for "angle of attack" should be consistently either AoA or AOA, but not a mixture. Wassermaus ( talk) 09:52, 1 July 2024 (UTC)