GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Chiswick Chap ( talk · contribs) 18:07, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
I'll take this on. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 18:07, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
This is a fine article and I have few general comments. The writing is exceptionally clear, with fine expositions of some technical subjects, such as "Evolution from amniotes".
On the whole I'm not keen on multiple images for the lead, but the fully-linked array of well-chosen example mammals is interesting and engaging, and might be a model for other "group" articles.
The illustrated cladogram in "Molecular classification" is a model of helpful presentation of technical detail. (I'd love to see part of it in Marine mammal.)
I note the occasional use of "don't" and "can't" in the article. Personally I think these are best avoided, but they, um, don't seem to be problematic in the context.
(It's a shame that Tikitherium is a redlink, but not an issue for this review.)
I think we're all done. This is a fine article and I'm happy to award it GA status. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 08:04, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Chiswick Chap ( talk · contribs) 18:07, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
I'll take this on. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 18:07, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
This is a fine article and I have few general comments. The writing is exceptionally clear, with fine expositions of some technical subjects, such as "Evolution from amniotes".
On the whole I'm not keen on multiple images for the lead, but the fully-linked array of well-chosen example mammals is interesting and engaging, and might be a model for other "group" articles.
The illustrated cladogram in "Molecular classification" is a model of helpful presentation of technical detail. (I'd love to see part of it in Marine mammal.)
I note the occasional use of "don't" and "can't" in the article. Personally I think these are best avoided, but they, um, don't seem to be problematic in the context.
(It's a shame that Tikitherium is a redlink, but not an issue for this review.)
I think we're all done. This is a fine article and I'm happy to award it GA status. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 08:04, 7 September 2016 (UTC)