This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance). Geology Low‑importance Talk:Malcolm McKenna is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter. Palaeontology: Paleontologists Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the paleontologists taskforce.

In my opinion, the listing of McKenna's publication takes up to much of the page and doesn't need to be included as it seems excessive. Hza a 9 ( talk) 03:04, 9 February 2015 (UTC) reply

• Strongly agree. Encyclopedia articles should not resemble CVs, directories, etc. The fact that many academic biographies unfortunately slide into this trend is no justification for the practice to continue. Complete listings of publications are appropriate for obituaries or other tributes, (which is the case in Bell, 2004 "Malcolm C. McKenna: A Biography and Bibliography", and indeed the entire issue dedicated to McKenna), but have no place in an encyclopedia. A better repository for this data dump would be the Wikispecies page: [1]. --Animalparty! ( talk) 18:24, 27 September 2016 (UTC) reply

I have moved the well curated yet excessive list of publications to McKenna's Wikispecies page with this edit. --Animalparty! ( talk) 04:26, 18 November 2017 (UTC) reply