This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There are many grammatical mistakes in this article. Please refrain from deleting any content and try to fix the grammar. Wikiexplorer13 12:54, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Uppercase-lowercase argument fixed in addition to few minor changes in sentences. Article is in no way whatsoever written in promotional tone. You deleted wildlife schedule act for no reason. Please reference 100 enclosures. You deleted "African buffalo". Important words "but not limited to" removed from sentence without no apparent reason. "The zoo remains open 6 days a week except mondays." makes perfect sense. Do not make unnecessary changes to the article according to your personal likings by specifying "grammatical mistakes" even if they fully conform to the english grammar.
@ Wikiexplorer13: the addition you're making is your own personal commentary on the zoo, and is quite promotional. It also violates WP:CITE. Quasar G t - c 08:17, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
As I've already mentioned, please do not judge what is "necessary" or what is "not necessary" as per your own personal opinion! I'll keep on adding what is important to the article as per Wikipedia policies. I've addressed most of your concerns as per your explanation above. You're welcome to make any minor changes but DO NOT destroy this article. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiexplorer13 ( talk • contribs) 08:03, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on ChattBir Zoo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:43, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Thank you bot! - Casktopic say 16:52, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
@ Casktopic: Hello, Casktopic. I see that you've restored the image gallery, with an edit summary that suggests WP:IG is not an appropriate citation for discussing image galleries. I find this assertion bizarre. I'm also puzzled at your statement that the images in the gallery should be placed next to "relevant text". This is puzzling because you didn't do that yourself when you restored the gallery and, in any event, it isn't clear what that "relevant text" might be.
If you wish to maintain the use of an image gallery here, the burden is on you to demonstrate that its use satisfies
WP:IG. You haven't yet done that. I look forward to your response.
NewYorkActuary (
talk)
10:49, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello
NewYorkActuary. Clearly your edits are more destructive than anything constructive. You removed information and held another user accountable for something which had an alternative solution. WP:IG explicitly states that there can be galleries if it can illustrate the aspects of the subject which in this case is the location where these images were taken and are directly related to the zoo not the individual animals. Relating to your "puzzled" statement, the image policy states "Images are typically interspersed individually throughout an article near the relevant text". Now if you don't know what or where relevant text is, it does not give you authority to destroy an article! Please read
WP:MOSIMAGES for further information.
Also note that you falsely accused me of saying "WP:IG is not an appropriate citation for discussing image galleries" in your response above.
-
Casktopic
say
13:10, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There are many grammatical mistakes in this article. Please refrain from deleting any content and try to fix the grammar. Wikiexplorer13 12:54, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Uppercase-lowercase argument fixed in addition to few minor changes in sentences. Article is in no way whatsoever written in promotional tone. You deleted wildlife schedule act for no reason. Please reference 100 enclosures. You deleted "African buffalo". Important words "but not limited to" removed from sentence without no apparent reason. "The zoo remains open 6 days a week except mondays." makes perfect sense. Do not make unnecessary changes to the article according to your personal likings by specifying "grammatical mistakes" even if they fully conform to the english grammar.
@ Wikiexplorer13: the addition you're making is your own personal commentary on the zoo, and is quite promotional. It also violates WP:CITE. Quasar G t - c 08:17, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
As I've already mentioned, please do not judge what is "necessary" or what is "not necessary" as per your own personal opinion! I'll keep on adding what is important to the article as per Wikipedia policies. I've addressed most of your concerns as per your explanation above. You're welcome to make any minor changes but DO NOT destroy this article. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiexplorer13 ( talk • contribs) 08:03, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on ChattBir Zoo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:43, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Thank you bot! - Casktopic say 16:52, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
@ Casktopic: Hello, Casktopic. I see that you've restored the image gallery, with an edit summary that suggests WP:IG is not an appropriate citation for discussing image galleries. I find this assertion bizarre. I'm also puzzled at your statement that the images in the gallery should be placed next to "relevant text". This is puzzling because you didn't do that yourself when you restored the gallery and, in any event, it isn't clear what that "relevant text" might be.
If you wish to maintain the use of an image gallery here, the burden is on you to demonstrate that its use satisfies
WP:IG. You haven't yet done that. I look forward to your response.
NewYorkActuary (
talk)
10:49, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello
NewYorkActuary. Clearly your edits are more destructive than anything constructive. You removed information and held another user accountable for something which had an alternative solution. WP:IG explicitly states that there can be galleries if it can illustrate the aspects of the subject which in this case is the location where these images were taken and are directly related to the zoo not the individual animals. Relating to your "puzzled" statement, the image policy states "Images are typically interspersed individually throughout an article near the relevant text". Now if you don't know what or where relevant text is, it does not give you authority to destroy an article! Please read
WP:MOSIMAGES for further information.
Also note that you falsely accused me of saying "WP:IG is not an appropriate citation for discussing image galleries" in your response above.
-
Casktopic
say
13:10, 20 August 2017 (UTC)