A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on October 25, 2017 and October 25, 2023. |
Daily page views
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please discussion the requested move to Magnus the Good at Talk:Harald I of Norway. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:49, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 09:19, 10 November 2007 (UTC) There is at least significant cause to question many of the accepted points, in that the mere dating and deeds of magnus I's life are in dispute at least back to 850 ad. particularly with reference to the completely omitted attributed deeds that earned the title of "the good" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.251.169.94 ( talk) 15:29, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
The note at the bottom of this page saying that it's translated from the Danish Wikipedia article dates back to 20:22 on 2 March 2003. I looked over there on my way to get the version number to replace the note with the "translated from X version" template, but the header for that edit says "Based on an article by Søren Sørensen," so I suspect the actual source was what's listed as "Søren Sørensen (www.aerenlund.dk)" under "Sources/External Links" on the Danish page. That makes it a bit more complicated; clearly it would be better to make inline references to that source in this article. Also the Danish article is shorter than this one; this one has grown in the over 100 edits since. So what I plan to do is look on Norwegian Wikipedia for more info and rewrite it to be on the safe side in case there is copyvio, and get a few inline references in if possible . . . unless someone else does the rewriting first :-) . . . and meanwhile I'll import the list of sources and links from the Danish page so that they're there for info as well as in acknowledgement of where the page seems to have in part come from.
And I also want to get the names internally consistent and matching their forms on en.wikipedia. Yngvadottir ( talk) 20:26, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
I have now completed a rewrite, with references. There is surprising disagreement about many things, and the no.wikipedia article has many more details but no sources for several that I would otherwise have used; so I hope others can continue to expand this with references I didn't find. Yngvadottir ( talk) 23:21, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
Can someone take a look at this and translate and add any new information.-- The Emperor's New Spy ( talk) 00:13, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was moved. -- BDD ( talk) 17:50, 3 October 2012 (UTC) ( non-admin closure)
Magnus I of Norway → Magnus the Good – Suggest to move the title of this article to Magnus the Good, which is a widespread, and by far the most common (per WP:COGNOMEN 2.), name used when referring to this king. Thhist ( talk) 16:37, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Magnus the Good. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:36, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
There are two paragraphs in this article which I find puzzling.
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on October 25, 2017 and October 25, 2023. |
Daily page views
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please discussion the requested move to Magnus the Good at Talk:Harald I of Norway. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:49, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 09:19, 10 November 2007 (UTC) There is at least significant cause to question many of the accepted points, in that the mere dating and deeds of magnus I's life are in dispute at least back to 850 ad. particularly with reference to the completely omitted attributed deeds that earned the title of "the good" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.251.169.94 ( talk) 15:29, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
The note at the bottom of this page saying that it's translated from the Danish Wikipedia article dates back to 20:22 on 2 March 2003. I looked over there on my way to get the version number to replace the note with the "translated from X version" template, but the header for that edit says "Based on an article by Søren Sørensen," so I suspect the actual source was what's listed as "Søren Sørensen (www.aerenlund.dk)" under "Sources/External Links" on the Danish page. That makes it a bit more complicated; clearly it would be better to make inline references to that source in this article. Also the Danish article is shorter than this one; this one has grown in the over 100 edits since. So what I plan to do is look on Norwegian Wikipedia for more info and rewrite it to be on the safe side in case there is copyvio, and get a few inline references in if possible . . . unless someone else does the rewriting first :-) . . . and meanwhile I'll import the list of sources and links from the Danish page so that they're there for info as well as in acknowledgement of where the page seems to have in part come from.
And I also want to get the names internally consistent and matching their forms on en.wikipedia. Yngvadottir ( talk) 20:26, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
I have now completed a rewrite, with references. There is surprising disagreement about many things, and the no.wikipedia article has many more details but no sources for several that I would otherwise have used; so I hope others can continue to expand this with references I didn't find. Yngvadottir ( talk) 23:21, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
Can someone take a look at this and translate and add any new information.-- The Emperor's New Spy ( talk) 00:13, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was moved. -- BDD ( talk) 17:50, 3 October 2012 (UTC) ( non-admin closure)
Magnus I of Norway → Magnus the Good – Suggest to move the title of this article to Magnus the Good, which is a widespread, and by far the most common (per WP:COGNOMEN 2.), name used when referring to this king. Thhist ( talk) 16:37, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Magnus the Good. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:36, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
There are two paragraphs in this article which I find puzzling.