Maggie Savoy has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: June 5, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: BennyOnTheLoose ( talk · contribs) 22:17, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
(Criteria marked are unassessed)
Happy to discuss, or be challenged on, any of my review comments. BennyOnTheLoose ( talk) 22:56, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Copyvio check - I reviewed all matches over 5% found using Earwig's Copyvio Detector. No concern, matches were nearly all just titles. No issues about paraphrasing from my review of sources.
Images - I think there would be a good case for a fair use image of Savoy, but if no free or suitable fair-use image is available, then that's OK.
Early life
Career
Savoy pressed for the wedding announcements of African-Americans to be included in the paper at a time when this was rare and wrote stories on rape helplines, domestic violence and pay disparities- no issues
As couples were unable to work together at the paper, a typical rule at the time, Savoy's hiring was seen to be controversial.- no issues. I was a bit confused about how the hiring happened, given the "unable to work together" restriction, but this is a reflection of the source.
she is not mentioned in the history of The Arizona Republic- no issues.
she was one of the reporters to be tear-gassed by the police- no issues.
Personal life
Death and legacy
Infobox and lead
Savoy worked to expand the focus- I wonder if this could be a slightly bolder statmement? I think it's fair to say she worked successfully to expand the focus, but I'm not saying that's the wording that need to be used. I feel the second para could be slightly longer, e.g. wiht more specific examples from her career or something from the second para of the legacy section.
Many thanks for all your work on the article, Sammielh. I have nearly nothing to add in the way of suggestions for improvement. Voss (2009) is obviously a key source and from what I've seen there and in the ther sources, you've done a great job in producing a well-balanced, suitably comprehensive article. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose ( talk) 00:00, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
Maggie Savoy has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: June 5, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: BennyOnTheLoose ( talk · contribs) 22:17, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
(Criteria marked are unassessed)
Happy to discuss, or be challenged on, any of my review comments. BennyOnTheLoose ( talk) 22:56, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Copyvio check - I reviewed all matches over 5% found using Earwig's Copyvio Detector. No concern, matches were nearly all just titles. No issues about paraphrasing from my review of sources.
Images - I think there would be a good case for a fair use image of Savoy, but if no free or suitable fair-use image is available, then that's OK.
Early life
Career
Savoy pressed for the wedding announcements of African-Americans to be included in the paper at a time when this was rare and wrote stories on rape helplines, domestic violence and pay disparities- no issues
As couples were unable to work together at the paper, a typical rule at the time, Savoy's hiring was seen to be controversial.- no issues. I was a bit confused about how the hiring happened, given the "unable to work together" restriction, but this is a reflection of the source.
she is not mentioned in the history of The Arizona Republic- no issues.
she was one of the reporters to be tear-gassed by the police- no issues.
Personal life
Death and legacy
Infobox and lead
Savoy worked to expand the focus- I wonder if this could be a slightly bolder statmement? I think it's fair to say she worked successfully to expand the focus, but I'm not saying that's the wording that need to be used. I feel the second para could be slightly longer, e.g. wiht more specific examples from her career or something from the second para of the legacy section.
Many thanks for all your work on the article, Sammielh. I have nearly nothing to add in the way of suggestions for improvement. Voss (2009) is obviously a key source and from what I've seen there and in the ther sources, you've done a great job in producing a well-balanced, suitably comprehensive article. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose ( talk) 00:00, 5 June 2023 (UTC)