Mafeje affair is currently a World history good article nominee. Nominated by FuzzyMagma ( talk) at 12:20, 30 December 2023 (UTC) Anyone who has not contributed significantly to (or nominated) this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the good article instructions.) Note: images are hidden to avoid quick fail if their copy right is disputed Short description: 1968 anti-government protests by South African students |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Mafeje affair article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from Archie Mafeje was copied or moved into The Mafeje Affair. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Mafeje affair was nominated as a History good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 27, 2023, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
The result was: withdrawn by nominator, closed by
Cielquiparle (
talk) 16:53, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Created by FuzzyMagma ( talk). Self-nominated at 17:22, 9 February 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/The Mafeje Affair; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
If some of the text in a nominated article was copied from another Wikipedia article, and the copied text is more than seven days old, then the copied text must be expanded fivefold as if the copied text had been a separate article.That unfortunately won't be possible. At this point, the article's sole chance for DYK that I can see is to become a Good Article and be nominated again within seven days of that happening. The expansion requirements are irrelevant to GAs. The GA criteria are here; information about the GA nomination process is here. BlueMoonset ( talk) 06:02, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 20:08, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Mujinga ( talk · contribs) 10:00, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
Mafeje affair is currently a World history good article nominee. Nominated by FuzzyMagma ( talk) at 12:20, 30 December 2023 (UTC) Anyone who has not contributed significantly to (or nominated) this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the good article instructions.) Note: images are hidden to avoid quick fail if their copy right is disputed Short description: 1968 anti-government protests by South African students |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Mafeje affair article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from Archie Mafeje was copied or moved into The Mafeje Affair. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Mafeje affair was nominated as a History good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 27, 2023, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
The result was: withdrawn by nominator, closed by
Cielquiparle (
talk) 16:53, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Created by FuzzyMagma ( talk). Self-nominated at 17:22, 9 February 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/The Mafeje Affair; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
If some of the text in a nominated article was copied from another Wikipedia article, and the copied text is more than seven days old, then the copied text must be expanded fivefold as if the copied text had been a separate article.That unfortunately won't be possible. At this point, the article's sole chance for DYK that I can see is to become a Good Article and be nominated again within seven days of that happening. The expansion requirements are irrelevant to GAs. The GA criteria are here; information about the GA nomination process is here. BlueMoonset ( talk) 06:02, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 20:08, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Mujinga ( talk · contribs) 10:00, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|