Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
This article has been reviewed as part of
Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the
Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, listed below. I will check back in seven days. If these issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a
Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through
WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at
WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far.
-- Malleus Fatuorum ( talk) 15:07, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
1. Deleted
2. Added source from Apple.com
3. Removed dubious sources
4. About accessdates and formats -- Can't a bot do this? This is not something editors should have to worry over. If people know how to set their time settings in their wikipedia preferences this is not an issue as it will display the date in your preferred format.
5. Not really, there are only guidelines as to the length needed for a lead and I believe they are met. You are welcome to suggest some additions, but this alone does not disqualify it from GA.
6. That is because Apple does not provide details about that type of information. No reason to fault the editors on this.
7. You gave little time to address this via your 'random' selection criteria.
Therefore I've added this to be reviewed for GA again. Nja247 ( talk • contribs) 09:01, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
This article has been reviewed as part of
Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the
Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, listed below. I will check back in seven days. If these issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a
Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through
WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at
WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far.
-- Malleus Fatuorum ( talk) 15:07, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
1. Deleted
2. Added source from Apple.com
3. Removed dubious sources
4. About accessdates and formats -- Can't a bot do this? This is not something editors should have to worry over. If people know how to set their time settings in their wikipedia preferences this is not an issue as it will display the date in your preferred format.
5. Not really, there are only guidelines as to the length needed for a lead and I believe they are met. You are welcome to suggest some additions, but this alone does not disqualify it from GA.
6. That is because Apple does not provide details about that type of information. No reason to fault the editors on this.
7. You gave little time to address this via your 'random' selection criteria.
Therefore I've added this to be reviewed for GA again. Nja247 ( talk • contribs) 09:01, 5 November 2008 (UTC)