A fact from MV RMS Mulheim appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 17 June 2010 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The ship's name is Mülheim, not Mulheim. It should be listed accordingly. While a Google search delivers some 14800 or 25000 hits, .de or .com, respectively, I do not think these results legitimate establishing "Mulheim" as common english usage for "Mülheim". Not based on a single wreck, and the city is listed correctly as Mülheim. More at WT:SHIPS#Names of foreign ships. -- G-41614 ( talk) 11:52, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was no consensus to move. Cúchullain t/ c 13:19, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
MV RMS Mulheim → RMS Mülheim – Sources refer to this ship as "RMS Mülheim". No source calls it "MV RMS Mulheim"; the double prefix is wrong. bobrayner ( talk) 09:18, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Oppose move: Trappist is correct. Although it may not seem so at first glance, there is only one ship prefix in use here - MV. As for the umlaut, this was originally in use, but was later dropped, as the photographs show. Mjroots ( talk) 14:35, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
MV RMS Mulheim. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 12:15, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
A fact from MV RMS Mulheim appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 17 June 2010 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The ship's name is Mülheim, not Mulheim. It should be listed accordingly. While a Google search delivers some 14800 or 25000 hits, .de or .com, respectively, I do not think these results legitimate establishing "Mulheim" as common english usage for "Mülheim". Not based on a single wreck, and the city is listed correctly as Mülheim. More at WT:SHIPS#Names of foreign ships. -- G-41614 ( talk) 11:52, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was no consensus to move. Cúchullain t/ c 13:19, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
MV RMS Mulheim → RMS Mülheim – Sources refer to this ship as "RMS Mülheim". No source calls it "MV RMS Mulheim"; the double prefix is wrong. bobrayner ( talk) 09:18, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Oppose move: Trappist is correct. Although it may not seem so at first glance, there is only one ship prefix in use here - MV. As for the umlaut, this was originally in use, but was later dropped, as the photographs show. Mjroots ( talk) 14:35, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
MV RMS Mulheim. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 12:15, 25 February 2016 (UTC)