This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Hong Kong: Transport Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Hong Kong Transport workgroup (assessed as Low-importance). Hong Kong To-do: history watch purge Attention needed (60) ...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (23) Collaboration needed Recommend topic Improvement needed GA-Class articles (59) • B-Class articles (285) Cleanup needed C-Class articles (1,006) Image needed (346) Destub needed Start-Class articles (5,377) • Stub-Class articles (6,709) Deorphan needed ...orphans Page creation needed Requested articles Miscellaneous tasks ...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (412) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,304) Trains: Rapid transit Low‑importance Trains Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated projects or task forces: /  This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.

I don't think the topic warrants its own article (certainly merits its own subsection in MTR though). There are a lot of sources, but many are duplicated, two are opinion pieces and most of them are about the MTR–KCR merger rather than the topic itself. Jc86035 ( talk) Use {{ re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 15:28, 31 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Absolutely! I agree — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.81.165.195 ( talk) 19:42, 28 December 2017 (UTC) reply

• Oppose. MTR is already a very long article. If this article isn't notable, then it should be deleted and receive very brief inclusion in the MTR article. As it is now, it seems that the information in this article is available only by a link in MTR's See also section. Seems notable enough.   Paine Ellsworth   ^put'r there   18:15, 27 January 2018 (UTC) reply