![]() | This article is a current
featured article candidate. A featured article should exemplify Wikipedia's best work, and is therefore expected to
meet the criteria. Please feel free to After one of the FAC coordinators promotes the article or archives the nomination, a bot will update the nomination page and article talk page. Do not manually update the {{ Article history}} template when the FAC closes. |
![]() | MLS Cup 2022 has been listed as one of the
Sports and recreation good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: February 22, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from MLS Cup 2022 appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 14 November 2022, and was viewed approximately 2,857 times (
disclaimer) (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result was: promoted by
SL93 (
talk)
01:38, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Converted from a redirect by SounderBruce ( talk). Self-nominated at 02:06, 4 November 2022 (UTC).
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Oltrepier ( talk · contribs) 13:23, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Sorry if your article stayed unreviewed for so long, but now I'm going to get the job done. This is just my second review, if I remember well, so I hope I'll do everything right. Still, the article already looks great, so it shouldn't be a difficult task. Let's take a closer look!
Oltrepier (
talk)
13:23, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Comments
@ SounderBruce: Alright, to be fair, I think I couldn't have asked for a better article to review! Overall, you've done an excellent job at writing down the article and providing reliable sources throughout it. I noticed just a few potential minor mistakes involving consecutio temporum (which I fixed by myself), but it's not a big deal at all. Plus, the article is neutral, broad in its coverage and focused, and all of the images look on point.
There's only one major doubt I wanted to solve before giving the green light, and it's about the issues you've had with that bot. What happened? And, do you need help to deal with it? I've seen that you can report bugs here, if you need to.
But anyways, I think this is a brilliant piece of work. Oltrepier ( talk) 14:17, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is a current
featured article candidate. A featured article should exemplify Wikipedia's best work, and is therefore expected to
meet the criteria. Please feel free to After one of the FAC coordinators promotes the article or archives the nomination, a bot will update the nomination page and article talk page. Do not manually update the {{ Article history}} template when the FAC closes. |
![]() | MLS Cup 2022 has been listed as one of the
Sports and recreation good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: February 22, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from MLS Cup 2022 appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 14 November 2022, and was viewed approximately 2,857 times (
disclaimer) (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result was: promoted by
SL93 (
talk)
01:38, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Converted from a redirect by SounderBruce ( talk). Self-nominated at 02:06, 4 November 2022 (UTC).
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Oltrepier ( talk · contribs) 13:23, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Sorry if your article stayed unreviewed for so long, but now I'm going to get the job done. This is just my second review, if I remember well, so I hope I'll do everything right. Still, the article already looks great, so it shouldn't be a difficult task. Let's take a closer look!
Oltrepier (
talk)
13:23, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Comments
@ SounderBruce: Alright, to be fair, I think I couldn't have asked for a better article to review! Overall, you've done an excellent job at writing down the article and providing reliable sources throughout it. I noticed just a few potential minor mistakes involving consecutio temporum (which I fixed by myself), but it's not a big deal at all. Plus, the article is neutral, broad in its coverage and focused, and all of the images look on point.
There's only one major doubt I wanted to solve before giving the green light, and it's about the issues you've had with that bot. What happened? And, do you need help to deal with it? I've seen that you can report bugs here, if you need to.
But anyways, I think this is a brilliant piece of work. Oltrepier ( talk) 14:17, 18 February 2023 (UTC)