![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the MIT-WPU Faculty of Engineering page were merged into MIT World Peace University on 4 February 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
I see no rationale for the merger, proposed by another. Starting the discussion anyway. gidonb ( talk) 06:31, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect MIT Schoo of Business. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 12#MIT Schoo of Business until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC 678 06:06, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
@ Rishab1989: please explain your revert of my edit to restore the spelling 'bangalow' instead of 'bangalo'. You gave no edit summary to explain your edit, which was unhelpful and discourteous, see WP:REVEXP.
I explained my edit in my edit summary: change spelling to 'bangalo', based on Wikt:bangalo. Wikt:bangalo indicates that this is a type of building similar to a bungalow, so it seemed probable that 'bangalow' was a non-standard spelling of 'bangalo'.
All the sources cited at the end of the paragraph that I can access online use the 'bungalow' spelling. [1] [2] [3]
The 'bangalow' spelling is not mentioned in Bungalow#India, nor in Wiktionary, except for an alternative form of Wikt:dak bungalow, but that does not fit here. I can't see any other use of this spelling in English Wikipedia except for the Australian town of Bangalow.
Without any explanation from you it seems likely that you are asserting that 'bangalow' is an established spelling in Indian English. Do you have any sources that confirm this, for example the use of this spelling in a reliable source?
We should probably change to 'bungalow', as this is the spelling used in the cited sources. Verbcatcher ( talk) 20:30, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the MIT-WPU Faculty of Engineering page were merged into MIT World Peace University on 4 February 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
I see no rationale for the merger, proposed by another. Starting the discussion anyway. gidonb ( talk) 06:31, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect MIT Schoo of Business. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 12#MIT Schoo of Business until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC 678 06:06, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
@ Rishab1989: please explain your revert of my edit to restore the spelling 'bangalow' instead of 'bangalo'. You gave no edit summary to explain your edit, which was unhelpful and discourteous, see WP:REVEXP.
I explained my edit in my edit summary: change spelling to 'bangalo', based on Wikt:bangalo. Wikt:bangalo indicates that this is a type of building similar to a bungalow, so it seemed probable that 'bangalow' was a non-standard spelling of 'bangalo'.
All the sources cited at the end of the paragraph that I can access online use the 'bungalow' spelling. [1] [2] [3]
The 'bangalow' spelling is not mentioned in Bungalow#India, nor in Wiktionary, except for an alternative form of Wikt:dak bungalow, but that does not fit here. I can't see any other use of this spelling in English Wikipedia except for the Australian town of Bangalow.
Without any explanation from you it seems likely that you are asserting that 'bangalow' is an established spelling in Indian English. Do you have any sources that confirm this, for example the use of this spelling in a reliable source?
We should probably change to 'bungalow', as this is the spelling used in the cited sources. Verbcatcher ( talk) 20:30, 24 August 2022 (UTC)