This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Should MEAN still be indicated as open-source, as MongoDB's license is no longer recognized as such?
Recently, a contributor added a proposed deletion (PROD), suggesting that this article is insufficiently notable to warrant a wikipedia article. I disagree. The MEAN stack is common vernacular amongst hackathon participants, as I may attribute writing this at the Spring 2015 PennApps hackathon, and as may be corroborated by Valeri Karpov in his blog post coining the term.
If anyone disagrees, particularly he who added the PROD (RHaworth), and he who replaced it after it was removed (CanadianLinuxUser), the latter with no other explanation than the edit summary "Please do not remove tag," I invite you to comment. ---- Mmpozulp ( talk) 22:06, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
I think it's probably good too leave it, but it needs to be expanded. When/how/why is the MEAN stack typically used?
75.158.23.29 (
talk) 23:52, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
The article says (with my comments in brackets): "Typically data is fetched [from where] using Ajax techniques and rendered in the browser on the client-side by a client-side application framework [by "typically" does the author mean if not using MEAN?] , however as the stack [I guess here the author means the MEAN stack] is commonly entirely JavaScript-based, in some implementations of the stack, server-side rendering where the rendering of the initial page can be offloaded to a server is used so that the initial data can be prefetched before it is loaded in the user's browser".
Okay after reading it a second time I realise that Angular must be server side, but it would be better for this to be explicitly stated. Something like:
would be more succinct as well as being more informative. FreeFlow99 ( talk) 05:56, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Should MEAN still be indicated as open-source, as MongoDB's license is no longer recognized as such?
Recently, a contributor added a proposed deletion (PROD), suggesting that this article is insufficiently notable to warrant a wikipedia article. I disagree. The MEAN stack is common vernacular amongst hackathon participants, as I may attribute writing this at the Spring 2015 PennApps hackathon, and as may be corroborated by Valeri Karpov in his blog post coining the term.
If anyone disagrees, particularly he who added the PROD (RHaworth), and he who replaced it after it was removed (CanadianLinuxUser), the latter with no other explanation than the edit summary "Please do not remove tag," I invite you to comment. ---- Mmpozulp ( talk) 22:06, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
I think it's probably good too leave it, but it needs to be expanded. When/how/why is the MEAN stack typically used?
75.158.23.29 (
talk) 23:52, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
The article says (with my comments in brackets): "Typically data is fetched [from where] using Ajax techniques and rendered in the browser on the client-side by a client-side application framework [by "typically" does the author mean if not using MEAN?] , however as the stack [I guess here the author means the MEAN stack] is commonly entirely JavaScript-based, in some implementations of the stack, server-side rendering where the rendering of the initial page can be offloaded to a server is used so that the initial data can be prefetched before it is loaded in the user's browser".
Okay after reading it a second time I realise that Angular must be server side, but it would be better for this to be explicitly stated. Something like:
would be more succinct as well as being more informative. FreeFlow99 ( talk) 05:56, 22 November 2021 (UTC)