![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:MARC Train lines. |
What's the reason for the name change on all the instances of MARC? Is there a source that this is an "official" name? On the MTA Website, there's no indication that the name is anything other than just "MARC". -- Jfruh 07:22, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
I see someone added details about the February, 1996 crash. Are there any other incidents that we can use to flesh out an "Accidents" section? Al 12:29, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
Considering it's a grand total of about 26 miles, does it strike anyone else as odd that the Penn line isn't simply extended to Newark, Delaware, where one could transfer to SEPTA? The track's already there, and it already goes to Perryville, it seems like it would be a rather easy thing to do. Any insights into why it doesn't? Doregasm 21:31, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Well, I just found my own answer: http://www.wilmapco.org/studies/Track%20A%20Feasability/PhaseII.htm Doregasm 21:36, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Now that these stations look to stay open in the immediate future, I think this section ought to be either greatly reduced or removed altogether from the article. What say you all? -- Jfruh ( talk) 18:59, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
After recent additions, this one incident takes up a sizeable chunk of a not particularly long article. I would propose moving it to its own article with a link from here. What say you all? -- Jfruh ( talk) 16:03, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
If anyone wonders Jessup station is closed it was a camden line stop and it is not there check the timetable at the stations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Plyhmrp ( talk • contribs) 19:19, April 10, 2007
(← Unindent) Speaking as a disinterested 3rd party, a railroad timetable is a reliable source. One's personal experience, watching from the platform, etc. would be original research. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 01:31, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Image:MARC Train Logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 12:53, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
I do not think that every last suicide and grade crossing (car vs. train) incident should be listed in the Crashes and Incidents section, unless they result in deaths or injuries to MARC passengers or significant damage to MARC equipment. Rationale:
Therefore, I propose removing the existing entry about the June 2007 suicide, and watching the section for any other such "minor" entries that do not qualify as "noteworthy". —Preceding unsigned comment added by SixSix ( talk • contribs) 16:55, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
http://phdcouncil.bme.jhu.edu/downloads/MTA_Map.gif
We could use a map like that... does anyone know how the MTA licenses their works? Probably copyrighted :| gren グレン 14:47, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
MARC | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The map has been added following a Graphic Lab request. Diagrams have been added to the individual line articles, and we are debating whether to include a combined diagram (shown right) in this article. It may be possible to collapse this completely to a single row MARC Train Service [show]. Certes ( talk) 13:03, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
Somebody just moved this page to a new name w/out discussion? You'll note the discussion above on this talk page (with sources) with the rationale for the previous location. -- Jfruh ( talk) 15:57, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
No mention in the article of service to Frederick, MD, on a spur from Brunswick. Who owns the track?-- Virgil H. Soule ( talk) 06:11, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
I re-added the map diagram to the infobox because it does provide useful information to this article in a compact form. I have it defaulting to showing all the line names and only terminus stations. I've collapsed the diagram by default so it doesn't take up much space. gren グレン 03:15, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
I'm finally calling BS on the "Maryland Area Rail Commuter" name, which, given that it is so awkward and contrived, is ostensibly nothing more than a made-up bacronym of "MARC" with no official sourcing. I know that a previous discussion in which I was involved, above, cites a Trains article as the source of this name, but I have a strong suspicion that this is a circular reference, in that Trains is getting the "Maryland Area Rail Commuter" name from Wikipedia (and, thusly, perpetuating a falsehood).
Anyway, the article implies that "Maryland Area Rail Commuter" is the current meaning of MARC, so any citation would need to confirm this to be the case.
I'd say to give this a few months and, if no reliable source can be provided in that time, it's out of here. SixSix ( talk) 14:09, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Home / Getting Around / Services
The MARC (Maryland Area Regional Commuter) Train Service is a commuter rail system whose service areas include Harford County, Maryland; Baltimore City; Washington D.C.; Brunswick, Maryland; Frederick, Maryland and Martinsburg, West Virginia.
The following MARC stations still need images:
I'd love to grab Seabrook (MARC station) on my next road trip up north, but I don't know when that's going to take place. Nevertheless, I'd still like to remind everybody here of them, so that the articles aren't neglected. --------- User:DanTD ( talk) 21:22, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was not moved. -- BDD ( talk) 16:55, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
MARC Train → MARC Train Service – Alternatively, just MARC (train) or MARC train. If we want to use a proper name, the sources show that it is MARC Train Service. If we prefer what it's commonly called, then MARC train. Or we could just use parenthetical disambiguation on the system name MARC. Pick one. But capitalizing Train is otherwise unwarranted. See books]. Dicklyon ( talk) 01:06, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
MARC Train. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers. — cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 16:34, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on MARC Train. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:22, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Any more images of those Bombardier Multi-Level Coaches? --------- User:DanTD ( talk) 22:49, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on MARC Train. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.wbaltv.com/politics/27069604/detail.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:04, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians! I was wondering if anyone had or could locate an image of one of the new MARC Chargers. I have also posted this message on Talk:Siemens Charger. I would do it, but while I have experience editing articles, I don't know anything about adding images, especially when it comes to copyright, etc. Thanks! Daybeers ( talk) 22:04, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Hey, while we're discussing images, two thoughts come to mind. First, can we get a better image for the MARC II in the coaches table. The one there is pretty lousy, because it's too head-on and the station canopy causes the small amount of the side that can be seen to be far too shadowy to give a good view of the car.
The second is the lead images. Both are significantly out of date, being the one has a completely retired model of locomotive, and the other has a model of which there is only one left in existence at all, and it's not the one in the image. Such outdated images give a false impression of the railroad's present state and don't serve the unfamiliar reader well. oknazevad ( talk) 13:13, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
@ Davidng913: I appreciate you adding information to the rolling stock section, but all information needs a source. If you have some for the information you have added, or anything else in that chart for that matter, please add it. Otherwise I'll have to remove anything that's unsourced. – Daybeers ( talk) 15:27, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
The section containing a roster of locomotives is missing a recent addition: New Jersey Transit 4145. It was built in October 1971 as a GP40 numbered B&O 4032 with the frame number 7340-58. It was numbered CSXT 6607 when it was rebuilt by Morrison-Knudsen as a GP40PH-2 and most recently ran on New Jersey Transit. In May 2018 it arrived at MARC’s Riverside Shop in Baltimore, MD, in exchange for the loan of MARC commuter cars to NJT. It's only intended for work train service, not commuter runs. Pictures of it may be found here: http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/locoPicture.aspx?id=19244&Page=4 VilePig ( talk)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 02:21, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:MARC Train lines. |
What's the reason for the name change on all the instances of MARC? Is there a source that this is an "official" name? On the MTA Website, there's no indication that the name is anything other than just "MARC". -- Jfruh 07:22, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
I see someone added details about the February, 1996 crash. Are there any other incidents that we can use to flesh out an "Accidents" section? Al 12:29, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
Considering it's a grand total of about 26 miles, does it strike anyone else as odd that the Penn line isn't simply extended to Newark, Delaware, where one could transfer to SEPTA? The track's already there, and it already goes to Perryville, it seems like it would be a rather easy thing to do. Any insights into why it doesn't? Doregasm 21:31, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Well, I just found my own answer: http://www.wilmapco.org/studies/Track%20A%20Feasability/PhaseII.htm Doregasm 21:36, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Now that these stations look to stay open in the immediate future, I think this section ought to be either greatly reduced or removed altogether from the article. What say you all? -- Jfruh ( talk) 18:59, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
After recent additions, this one incident takes up a sizeable chunk of a not particularly long article. I would propose moving it to its own article with a link from here. What say you all? -- Jfruh ( talk) 16:03, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
If anyone wonders Jessup station is closed it was a camden line stop and it is not there check the timetable at the stations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Plyhmrp ( talk • contribs) 19:19, April 10, 2007
(← Unindent) Speaking as a disinterested 3rd party, a railroad timetable is a reliable source. One's personal experience, watching from the platform, etc. would be original research. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 01:31, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Image:MARC Train Logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 12:53, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
I do not think that every last suicide and grade crossing (car vs. train) incident should be listed in the Crashes and Incidents section, unless they result in deaths or injuries to MARC passengers or significant damage to MARC equipment. Rationale:
Therefore, I propose removing the existing entry about the June 2007 suicide, and watching the section for any other such "minor" entries that do not qualify as "noteworthy". —Preceding unsigned comment added by SixSix ( talk • contribs) 16:55, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
http://phdcouncil.bme.jhu.edu/downloads/MTA_Map.gif
We could use a map like that... does anyone know how the MTA licenses their works? Probably copyrighted :| gren グレン 14:47, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
MARC | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The map has been added following a Graphic Lab request. Diagrams have been added to the individual line articles, and we are debating whether to include a combined diagram (shown right) in this article. It may be possible to collapse this completely to a single row MARC Train Service [show]. Certes ( talk) 13:03, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
Somebody just moved this page to a new name w/out discussion? You'll note the discussion above on this talk page (with sources) with the rationale for the previous location. -- Jfruh ( talk) 15:57, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
No mention in the article of service to Frederick, MD, on a spur from Brunswick. Who owns the track?-- Virgil H. Soule ( talk) 06:11, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
I re-added the map diagram to the infobox because it does provide useful information to this article in a compact form. I have it defaulting to showing all the line names and only terminus stations. I've collapsed the diagram by default so it doesn't take up much space. gren グレン 03:15, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
I'm finally calling BS on the "Maryland Area Rail Commuter" name, which, given that it is so awkward and contrived, is ostensibly nothing more than a made-up bacronym of "MARC" with no official sourcing. I know that a previous discussion in which I was involved, above, cites a Trains article as the source of this name, but I have a strong suspicion that this is a circular reference, in that Trains is getting the "Maryland Area Rail Commuter" name from Wikipedia (and, thusly, perpetuating a falsehood).
Anyway, the article implies that "Maryland Area Rail Commuter" is the current meaning of MARC, so any citation would need to confirm this to be the case.
I'd say to give this a few months and, if no reliable source can be provided in that time, it's out of here. SixSix ( talk) 14:09, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Home / Getting Around / Services
The MARC (Maryland Area Regional Commuter) Train Service is a commuter rail system whose service areas include Harford County, Maryland; Baltimore City; Washington D.C.; Brunswick, Maryland; Frederick, Maryland and Martinsburg, West Virginia.
The following MARC stations still need images:
I'd love to grab Seabrook (MARC station) on my next road trip up north, but I don't know when that's going to take place. Nevertheless, I'd still like to remind everybody here of them, so that the articles aren't neglected. --------- User:DanTD ( talk) 21:22, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was not moved. -- BDD ( talk) 16:55, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
MARC Train → MARC Train Service – Alternatively, just MARC (train) or MARC train. If we want to use a proper name, the sources show that it is MARC Train Service. If we prefer what it's commonly called, then MARC train. Or we could just use parenthetical disambiguation on the system name MARC. Pick one. But capitalizing Train is otherwise unwarranted. See books]. Dicklyon ( talk) 01:06, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
MARC Train. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers. — cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 16:34, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on MARC Train. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:22, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Any more images of those Bombardier Multi-Level Coaches? --------- User:DanTD ( talk) 22:49, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on MARC Train. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.wbaltv.com/politics/27069604/detail.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:04, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians! I was wondering if anyone had or could locate an image of one of the new MARC Chargers. I have also posted this message on Talk:Siemens Charger. I would do it, but while I have experience editing articles, I don't know anything about adding images, especially when it comes to copyright, etc. Thanks! Daybeers ( talk) 22:04, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Hey, while we're discussing images, two thoughts come to mind. First, can we get a better image for the MARC II in the coaches table. The one there is pretty lousy, because it's too head-on and the station canopy causes the small amount of the side that can be seen to be far too shadowy to give a good view of the car.
The second is the lead images. Both are significantly out of date, being the one has a completely retired model of locomotive, and the other has a model of which there is only one left in existence at all, and it's not the one in the image. Such outdated images give a false impression of the railroad's present state and don't serve the unfamiliar reader well. oknazevad ( talk) 13:13, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
@ Davidng913: I appreciate you adding information to the rolling stock section, but all information needs a source. If you have some for the information you have added, or anything else in that chart for that matter, please add it. Otherwise I'll have to remove anything that's unsourced. – Daybeers ( talk) 15:27, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
The section containing a roster of locomotives is missing a recent addition: New Jersey Transit 4145. It was built in October 1971 as a GP40 numbered B&O 4032 with the frame number 7340-58. It was numbered CSXT 6607 when it was rebuilt by Morrison-Knudsen as a GP40PH-2 and most recently ran on New Jersey Transit. In May 2018 it arrived at MARC’s Riverside Shop in Baltimore, MD, in exchange for the loan of MARC commuter cars to NJT. It's only intended for work train service, not commuter runs. Pictures of it may be found here: http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/locoPicture.aspx?id=19244&Page=4 VilePig ( talk)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 02:21, 4 December 2019 (UTC)