This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
M2 mortar article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image removed. The mortar shown was *NOT* a US M2 60mm mortar. Even a cursory comparison would reveal major differences in the bipod configuration, it lacks the T&E mechanism of the US M2, the tube is quite different, and the breech cap is completely unlike that of the US M2. The baseplate was also completely unlike that of the US M2. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.130.1.193 ( talk) 01:31, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was move all
Anthony Appleyard (
talk) 16:07, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
M2 Mortar →
M2 mortar — per concensus at
user:user name one/Capitalization
username 1 (
talk) 02:34, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
username 1 ( talk) 14:52, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
I suspect this is a case of mistaken identity for the M2 4.2 inch mortar (which was a chemical weapons project), especially since this M2 mortar didn't fire any chemical munitions. Unless anyone has a good reason for this I suspect the "U.S. infantry weapons of World War II and Korea" directory would be a better fit. 62.196.17.197 ( talk) 08:40, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
M2 mortar article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image removed. The mortar shown was *NOT* a US M2 60mm mortar. Even a cursory comparison would reveal major differences in the bipod configuration, it lacks the T&E mechanism of the US M2, the tube is quite different, and the breech cap is completely unlike that of the US M2. The baseplate was also completely unlike that of the US M2. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.130.1.193 ( talk) 01:31, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was move all
Anthony Appleyard (
talk) 16:07, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
M2 Mortar →
M2 mortar — per concensus at
user:user name one/Capitalization
username 1 (
talk) 02:34, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
username 1 ( talk) 14:52, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
I suspect this is a case of mistaken identity for the M2 4.2 inch mortar (which was a chemical weapons project), especially since this M2 mortar didn't fire any chemical munitions. Unless anyone has a good reason for this I suspect the "U.S. infantry weapons of World War II and Korea" directory would be a better fit. 62.196.17.197 ( talk) 08:40, 26 August 2014 (UTC)