![]() | M16 Multiple Gun Motor Carriage has been listed as one of the
Warfare good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: November 3, 2015. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
M16 Multiple Gun Motor Carriage article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | A fact from M16 Multiple Gun Motor Carriage appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 21 November 2015 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: ErrantX ( talk · contribs) 16:02, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
I am happy to review this.
A decent little article (I appreciate the difficulty of writing about things with limited resource/material). Apart from some relatively minor prose issue, I think the only really GA-limiting problem is the detail missing from the specification section.
Please feel free to reply inline. I will add additional comments above as I re-read. -- Errant ( chat!) 16:02, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
New user.
Could someone please change the crew number to 5 (Commander, driver, gunner and two loaders)?
“The M16 was based on the M3 personnel carrier half-track. It had a crew of five: commander, driver, gunner and two loaders.” </ref> https://www.army.mil/article/87246/students_learn_from_wwii_weapon<ref>
Thanks!
![]() | M16 Multiple Gun Motor Carriage has been listed as one of the
Warfare good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: November 3, 2015. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
M16 Multiple Gun Motor Carriage article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | A fact from M16 Multiple Gun Motor Carriage appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 21 November 2015 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: ErrantX ( talk · contribs) 16:02, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
I am happy to review this.
A decent little article (I appreciate the difficulty of writing about things with limited resource/material). Apart from some relatively minor prose issue, I think the only really GA-limiting problem is the detail missing from the specification section.
Please feel free to reply inline. I will add additional comments above as I re-read. -- Errant ( chat!) 16:02, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
New user.
Could someone please change the crew number to 5 (Commander, driver, gunner and two loaders)?
“The M16 was based on the M3 personnel carrier half-track. It had a crew of five: commander, driver, gunner and two loaders.” </ref> https://www.army.mil/article/87246/students_learn_from_wwii_weapon<ref>
Thanks!