Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
This article is very well-written, and I had only three concerns:
At first, I wasn't sure if the section on the state park was necessary, as it could be argued that it gets off-topic. I thought about it for a while and decided that anyone who was planning on driving the road would want to know about what is in the state park. It's a concise summary that gives only the highlights, and a helpful link is provided to the main article. As such, I believe that removing the information would be harmful to the article.
I will place the nomination on hold to allow for these concerns to be addressed and/or discussed. Any questions or comments can be left here, as I have placed this page on my watchlist. Best wishes, GaryColemanFan ( talk) 18:18, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the quick replies. I am satisfied that the article meets the GA criteria, so I am promoting it. Best wishes, GaryColemanFan ( talk) 20:24, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
This article is very well-written, and I had only three concerns:
At first, I wasn't sure if the section on the state park was necessary, as it could be argued that it gets off-topic. I thought about it for a while and decided that anyone who was planning on driving the road would want to know about what is in the state park. It's a concise summary that gives only the highlights, and a helpful link is provided to the main article. As such, I believe that removing the information would be harmful to the article.
I will place the nomination on hold to allow for these concerns to be addressed and/or discussed. Any questions or comments can be left here, as I have placed this page on my watchlist. Best wishes, GaryColemanFan ( talk) 18:18, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the quick replies. I am satisfied that the article meets the GA criteria, so I am promoting it. Best wishes, GaryColemanFan ( talk) 20:24, 13 October 2008 (UTC)