Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dough 48 72 02:51, 18 December 2010 (UTC) reply

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b ( MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused): c Fair representation without bias:

4. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

5. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   An image of the road would be nice, but not required.

6. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Aside from missing a picture, the article looks good and I will pass it. Dough 48 72 02:51, 18 December 2010 (UTC) reply