![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Lystrosaurus is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive. | |||||||||
|
In the Walking with Monsters program, it is said that all living lystrosaurus made up 50% of living organisms on earth after the permian extinction? If this is accurate than it should be mentioned here. this is the video, mentioned at around 5:36 -- Philip Laurence 19:53, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
The article states "It is the only time a single species of animal dominated the Earth to such a degree". What about Homo sapiens? I'm guessing that we now outnumber these animals by an order of magnitude. 138.77.2.131 01:17, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
The Human species in terms of number is very small when compared to "all living organisms". Regarding the Lystrosaurus, it's very feasible if you know the size of devastation which occured at the end of the pernian. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marco123456789 ( talk • contribs) 18:13, August 28, 2007 (UTC)
"This genus survived the end-Permian mass extinction and went on to thrive, becoming the most common group of terrestrial vertebrates during the Early Triassic. It is the only time a single species of animal dominated the Earth to such a degree."
Should the latter be "genus" as well? The rest of the article treats Lystrosaurus as a genus, not a species. B.Bryant ( talk) 07:49, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm not happy about the results of the 2 edits following [1]:
Daft point possibly, but how can this be start class at the paleontology wikiproject and be up for FA status? TerriG 86.11.1.228 ( talk) 10:02, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
The image showing the relative sizes of Lystrosaurus and human silhouettes seems to use a quite small Lystrosaurus specimen: just over half a meter long. The text (and its citation) gives a significantly longer size: nearly one meter. Is there a reason for the discrepancy? -- 170.145.0.100 ( talk) 20:35, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
someone here that can look at a backup? 92.109.153.185 ( talk) 00:07, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Lystrosaurus. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 01:58, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Is there some source to back up this odd and poorly written claim? "It also used these tusks for defense and rip small predators apart, despite being a herbivore." Alexandermoir ( talk) 18:27, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Lystrosaurus is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive. | |||||||||
|
In the Walking with Monsters program, it is said that all living lystrosaurus made up 50% of living organisms on earth after the permian extinction? If this is accurate than it should be mentioned here. this is the video, mentioned at around 5:36 -- Philip Laurence 19:53, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
The article states "It is the only time a single species of animal dominated the Earth to such a degree". What about Homo sapiens? I'm guessing that we now outnumber these animals by an order of magnitude. 138.77.2.131 01:17, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
The Human species in terms of number is very small when compared to "all living organisms". Regarding the Lystrosaurus, it's very feasible if you know the size of devastation which occured at the end of the pernian. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marco123456789 ( talk • contribs) 18:13, August 28, 2007 (UTC)
"This genus survived the end-Permian mass extinction and went on to thrive, becoming the most common group of terrestrial vertebrates during the Early Triassic. It is the only time a single species of animal dominated the Earth to such a degree."
Should the latter be "genus" as well? The rest of the article treats Lystrosaurus as a genus, not a species. B.Bryant ( talk) 07:49, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm not happy about the results of the 2 edits following [1]:
Daft point possibly, but how can this be start class at the paleontology wikiproject and be up for FA status? TerriG 86.11.1.228 ( talk) 10:02, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
The image showing the relative sizes of Lystrosaurus and human silhouettes seems to use a quite small Lystrosaurus specimen: just over half a meter long. The text (and its citation) gives a significantly longer size: nearly one meter. Is there a reason for the discrepancy? -- 170.145.0.100 ( talk) 20:35, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
someone here that can look at a backup? 92.109.153.185 ( talk) 00:07, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Lystrosaurus. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 01:58, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Is there some source to back up this odd and poorly written claim? "It also used these tusks for defense and rip small predators apart, despite being a herbivore." Alexandermoir ( talk) 18:27, 15 November 2023 (UTC)