This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Lynching in Ramallah redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
photo evidence http://inhonor.net/ramlah/ shows that they werent wearing palestinian police uniforms, or dressed undercover as arabs. They were wearing army fatigues, therefor the entire account is fictitious, and not worthy of being in a scholarly article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drsmoo ( talk • contribs) 20:11, 3 March 2007
It's well known that all the Palestinians were enraged by the killing of Mohammed al_Durrah, and that's why, for the first time ever, they turned on the reservists and carried out the Ramallah lynching.
Here's what the BBC said about it: "The Israeli army believes the men were forcibly abducted. The Palestinian police deny that they were arrested and deliberately put in danger. Vadim and his colleague found themselves surrounded by an angry mob. Ominously a poster of Mohammed al-Durrah and his father was prominently displayed. The two Israelis were hustled into the local police station. The media were warned not to take pictures as the crowds forced their way in." [1] I don't understant why it's been reverted from the article. PR talk 19:48, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Lynching in Ramallah redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
photo evidence http://inhonor.net/ramlah/ shows that they werent wearing palestinian police uniforms, or dressed undercover as arabs. They were wearing army fatigues, therefor the entire account is fictitious, and not worthy of being in a scholarly article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drsmoo ( talk • contribs) 20:11, 3 March 2007
It's well known that all the Palestinians were enraged by the killing of Mohammed al_Durrah, and that's why, for the first time ever, they turned on the reservists and carried out the Ramallah lynching.
Here's what the BBC said about it: "The Israeli army believes the men were forcibly abducted. The Palestinian police deny that they were arrested and deliberately put in danger. Vadim and his colleague found themselves surrounded by an angry mob. Ominously a poster of Mohammed al-Durrah and his father was prominently displayed. The two Israelis were hustled into the local police station. The media were warned not to take pictures as the crowds forced their way in." [1] I don't understant why it's been reverted from the article. PR talk 19:48, 22 October 2007 (UTC)