This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Chemicals Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Plants Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Is this 72 known(?) isomers, or the result of a calculation - with 11 olefins possibly being E/Z surely that's 2¹¹ isomers, sterics nonwithstanding? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.130.133.64 ( talk) 18:07, 13 May 2008 (UTC) reply

The result is from a calculation (published in a research paper, not my own and I didn't question how they arrived at that number). Don't forget, however, that there's symmetry involved, so half the stereocenters are equivalent. 2⁶ = 64, and I'm not sure how they arrive at 72, but I think that symmetry simplifies the total number of isomers. Jeff Dahl ( Talk • contribs) 22:30, 13 May 2008 (UTC) reply

UPDATE: I found a source to explain why there are 72 (cited in main article). The reason is due to steric hinderance, the 72 are the only ones sterically possible. Jeff Dahl ( Talk • contribs) 16:34, 26 January 2009 (UTC) reply