This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
LyX article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
Just to let you know. The purpose of selecting an article is both to point readers to the article and to highlight it to potential contributors. It will remain on the portal for a week or so. The previous selected article was KHTML. Gronky 09:42, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
This article is in Category:Free TeX editors. Is that correct, even if you count a LaTeX editor as a TeX editor? The article calls it a front-end to the LaTeX typesetting system, and the screenshots shows LyX editing a file named something.lyx (not .tex). To me, a TeX editor must be able to open (not import) any TeX document, modify and save (not export) that document again. I'm not convinced that is what LyX does. JöG ( talk) 16:17, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
See also has List of word processors, but LyX is not a word processor, according to the article. Should it be omitted or amended? Llamabr ( talk) 15:56, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
It seems the math tagging:
() executes pretty slowly. Why not instead use the simple <span> tag in standard CSS:
(LYX) which requires no processing except by the web browser? Rursus dixit. ( mbork3!) 08:56, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
The pronunciation in article have two different definitions. On article head the two (ipa and respelling) the name is said to be pronounced like "leek", but on the pronunciation topic, is said that developers do it like "leeks", don't saying if this is correct or not. As the pronunciation of TeX suffer from the same ambiguity problem, i think this should be solved, or else make the ambiguity explicit on the pronunciation topic, unless of course some better explanation exist for the ambiguity. Flavio.mprado ( talk) 02:25, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
LyX article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
Just to let you know. The purpose of selecting an article is both to point readers to the article and to highlight it to potential contributors. It will remain on the portal for a week or so. The previous selected article was KHTML. Gronky 09:42, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
This article is in Category:Free TeX editors. Is that correct, even if you count a LaTeX editor as a TeX editor? The article calls it a front-end to the LaTeX typesetting system, and the screenshots shows LyX editing a file named something.lyx (not .tex). To me, a TeX editor must be able to open (not import) any TeX document, modify and save (not export) that document again. I'm not convinced that is what LyX does. JöG ( talk) 16:17, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
See also has List of word processors, but LyX is not a word processor, according to the article. Should it be omitted or amended? Llamabr ( talk) 15:56, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
It seems the math tagging:
() executes pretty slowly. Why not instead use the simple <span> tag in standard CSS:
(LYX) which requires no processing except by the web browser? Rursus dixit. ( mbork3!) 08:56, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
The pronunciation in article have two different definitions. On article head the two (ipa and respelling) the name is said to be pronounced like "leek", but on the pronunciation topic, is said that developers do it like "leeks", don't saying if this is correct or not. As the pronunciation of TeX suffer from the same ambiguity problem, i think this should be solved, or else make the ambiguity explicit on the pronunciation topic, unless of course some better explanation exist for the ambiguity. Flavio.mprado ( talk) 02:25, 21 August 2016 (UTC)