This   level-4 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Elements Mid‑importance This article is supported by WikiProject Elements, which gives a central approach to the chemical elements and their isotopes on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing this article, or visit the project page for more details.ElementsWikipedia:WikiProject ElementsTemplate:WikiProject Elementschemical elements articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

	Lutetium has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
	Lutetium is part of the Group 3 elements series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones Date Process Result September 10, 2011 Good article nominee Listed August 25, 2022 Good topic candidate Promoted
Current status: Good article

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

Some of the text in this entry was rewritten from Los Alamos National Laboratory - Lutetium. Additional text was taken directly from the Elements database 20001107 (via dict.org), Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913) (via dict.org) and WordNet (r) 1.7 (via dict.org). Data for the table were obtained from the sources listed on the subject page and Wikipedia:WikiProject Elements but were reformatted and converted into SI units.

The occurrence section states that this element is "the least abundant of all naturally-occurring elements". The article on Astatine also makes this claim, when it says "Astatine is the rarest naturally occuring element". They can't both be the rarest natrally occuring elements. TerraFrost 02:38, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I think this has already been corrected, but lutetium is ranked as about as abundant as silver. Scott Tygett Sept. 2007

History culling has been overdone, has it not?

Plus this entry, on tablets at least, seems to have been been thrashed. 2600:1700:ED01:C70:C5BD:A7FC:33DF:649B ( talk) 14:57, 30 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Proposal to add to the “Applications” section

Several outlets are reporting preliminary results from a research team using lutetium hydrides as a material for room temperature, relatively low pressure superconductors.

Reporting

Given the controversial history of the team and previous retractions, I recommend waiting for the forthcoming Nature, article publication. Wmcleod ( talk) 13:42, 25 March 2023 (UTC) reply

It's pronounced /luːˈtiːʃiəm/, not /ljuːˈtiːʃiəm/. Imacrab1 ( talk) 18:34, 26 January 2024 (UTC) reply

OED has /l(j)uːˈtiːʃɪəm/ or /l(j)uːˈtiːsɪəm/ (BrE), /lʊˈtiʃ(i)əm/ (AmE). Double sharp ( talk) 09:57, 31 January 2024 (UTC) reply

What are you even saying Imacrab1 ( talk) 11:45, 31 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Since some of its main uses are of the very short-lived isotopes (for medical purposes), and these obviously are not naturally occurring, can something be said about how these are produced? Whether here, or in the article about isotopes of lutetium, or somewhere--and then a pointer from here. Mcswell ( talk) 14:56, 21 June 2024 (UTC) reply

 Done Johnjbarton ( talk) 15:44, 21 June 2024 (UTC) reply