This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
The article does not say. John Paul Parks ( talk) 16:59, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
The lead has the statement "She was the first woman, and second African American, to hold the position.", but this doesn't seem to be backed up by any cited text in the body of the article or by an inline citation. Something to be clarified: please resolve. Thanks, dave souza, talk 18:04, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
While the addition of career information by Luritadoan is helpful, it doesn't belong in the lede paragraph of the article. See WP:LEDE. Are you really Lurita Doan? If so, that also might present a problem.-- Happysomeone ( talk) 17:46, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
For everyone's benefit, I'm excising the relevant part of my old discussion and pasting it here with regards to the claim that "no action was taken" against Doan. It doesn't say that anywhere in the cite. It also doesn't mention an important finding from the US Office of Special Counsel. This quote is 1) In violation of WP:OR and WP:SYNTH and 2) Is factually incorrect. Here's the old discussion:
"It is true that she was never found in a court to have violated any law (2). This is, however, due solely to the fact that the agency responsible for prosecution is the Office of the President (as she is a Presidential appointee, and not under the Merit Systems Protection Board's purview). It is therefore disingenuous to suggest in this way that this is nothing more than "interagency personality conflict." This conflict reaches into the top tier of our government. The article, as it now stands and properly cited, demonstrates Doan [7] was found in violation of Federal law by an investigative body and should be left unedited."
-- Happysomeone ( talk) 19:34, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 4 external links on
Lurita Doan. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 07:19, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Lurita Doan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:35, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
The article does not say. John Paul Parks ( talk) 16:59, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
The lead has the statement "She was the first woman, and second African American, to hold the position.", but this doesn't seem to be backed up by any cited text in the body of the article or by an inline citation. Something to be clarified: please resolve. Thanks, dave souza, talk 18:04, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
While the addition of career information by Luritadoan is helpful, it doesn't belong in the lede paragraph of the article. See WP:LEDE. Are you really Lurita Doan? If so, that also might present a problem.-- Happysomeone ( talk) 17:46, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
For everyone's benefit, I'm excising the relevant part of my old discussion and pasting it here with regards to the claim that "no action was taken" against Doan. It doesn't say that anywhere in the cite. It also doesn't mention an important finding from the US Office of Special Counsel. This quote is 1) In violation of WP:OR and WP:SYNTH and 2) Is factually incorrect. Here's the old discussion:
"It is true that she was never found in a court to have violated any law (2). This is, however, due solely to the fact that the agency responsible for prosecution is the Office of the President (as she is a Presidential appointee, and not under the Merit Systems Protection Board's purview). It is therefore disingenuous to suggest in this way that this is nothing more than "interagency personality conflict." This conflict reaches into the top tier of our government. The article, as it now stands and properly cited, demonstrates Doan [7] was found in violation of Federal law by an investigative body and should be left unedited."
-- Happysomeone ( talk) 19:34, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 4 external links on
Lurita Doan. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 07:19, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Lurita Doan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:35, 27 May 2017 (UTC)