![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'm trying to start a discussion on what I feel are improper usage of the biased, and incorrect, leanings of page editors. Specifically, Lulu's abortion keeps being categorized as the death of a child, making Lulu the mother of a dead baby. This is incorrect -- when women have miscarriages, they are not issued a death certificate. The law does not consider what they lose when they have miscarriages as dead children. When a woman has a miscarriage, she does not call the coroner to investigate the remains and determine a "cause of death".
Any argument of making the standards different for abortion would reveal a biased anti-abortion argument -- not appropriate for a neutral body like Wikipedia. Comolaflores 08:24, 23 April 2007 (UTC
Whoa, people have really gone over onto the deep end. Not only characterizing a terminated pregnancy as a dead child (according to that logic, my friend who had a six-week miscarriage is the mother of a deceased baby, too) but you've actually invented a name for the embryo? This is not only totally inappropriate for Wikipedia, but frankly more than a little creepy. 19:35, 23 June 2007 (UTC) (Comolaflores)
I can see that a lot of good work is being done on this article, thanks. :) I recommend that for further improvement, that the plot summary section be whittled down to about 500 words. For Manual of Style guidelines, please see WP:WAF. Another good resource is Wikipedia:WikiProject Soap Operas :) -- El on ka 00:44, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
The entire article seems to be littered with bias and pov comments for the entire portion of Lulu/Logan and Johnny/Lulu exerpts in the article. Can someone trim it up. It just seems completely biased in favor of Logan. Can we clean it up and make it more neutral? Skinwalker03 20:29, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Right now this article has little more than plot summary. Can we provide some more "real world" context? For example, which actresses have played the part? Were they nominated for any awards? Were the plot lines ever covered in "non-soap" sources? Etc. -- El on ka 23:13, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
The section on Logan's murder/mental instability seems out of place, especially since the rest of the development section revolves around her interpersonal relationships. The murder/mental section is also primarily storyline - I'd like to put it into the storyline section, which would also strengthen that section with its quotes/real world context. Any objections? Kelly Marie 0812 ( talk) 20:57, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
i feel that the storyline sections should be strictly plot. Maybe we could put the murder/mental section before the romantic relationships, but that would also be a bit out of place. Caringtype1 ( talk) 21:12, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Is She pregnant in real life, been sporting a baby bump with loose clothing.
Pat Kershaw General Hospital Watcher Since late 80's early 90's — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:833D:8790:2D05:19D9:5B77:2456 ( talk) 23:14, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'm trying to start a discussion on what I feel are improper usage of the biased, and incorrect, leanings of page editors. Specifically, Lulu's abortion keeps being categorized as the death of a child, making Lulu the mother of a dead baby. This is incorrect -- when women have miscarriages, they are not issued a death certificate. The law does not consider what they lose when they have miscarriages as dead children. When a woman has a miscarriage, she does not call the coroner to investigate the remains and determine a "cause of death".
Any argument of making the standards different for abortion would reveal a biased anti-abortion argument -- not appropriate for a neutral body like Wikipedia. Comolaflores 08:24, 23 April 2007 (UTC
Whoa, people have really gone over onto the deep end. Not only characterizing a terminated pregnancy as a dead child (according to that logic, my friend who had a six-week miscarriage is the mother of a deceased baby, too) but you've actually invented a name for the embryo? This is not only totally inappropriate for Wikipedia, but frankly more than a little creepy. 19:35, 23 June 2007 (UTC) (Comolaflores)
I can see that a lot of good work is being done on this article, thanks. :) I recommend that for further improvement, that the plot summary section be whittled down to about 500 words. For Manual of Style guidelines, please see WP:WAF. Another good resource is Wikipedia:WikiProject Soap Operas :) -- El on ka 00:44, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
The entire article seems to be littered with bias and pov comments for the entire portion of Lulu/Logan and Johnny/Lulu exerpts in the article. Can someone trim it up. It just seems completely biased in favor of Logan. Can we clean it up and make it more neutral? Skinwalker03 20:29, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Right now this article has little more than plot summary. Can we provide some more "real world" context? For example, which actresses have played the part? Were they nominated for any awards? Were the plot lines ever covered in "non-soap" sources? Etc. -- El on ka 23:13, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
The section on Logan's murder/mental instability seems out of place, especially since the rest of the development section revolves around her interpersonal relationships. The murder/mental section is also primarily storyline - I'd like to put it into the storyline section, which would also strengthen that section with its quotes/real world context. Any objections? Kelly Marie 0812 ( talk) 20:57, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
i feel that the storyline sections should be strictly plot. Maybe we could put the murder/mental section before the romantic relationships, but that would also be a bit out of place. Caringtype1 ( talk) 21:12, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Is She pregnant in real life, been sporting a baby bump with loose clothing.
Pat Kershaw General Hospital Watcher Since late 80's early 90's — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:833D:8790:2D05:19D9:5B77:2456 ( talk) 23:14, 5 June 2017 (UTC)