 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the Lufengpithecus hudienensis page were merged into Lufengpithecus on 3 October 2019 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of this discussion was Merged. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 10:22, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
- Support it is highly unusual for extinct species to have their own page instead of all of them being discussed in the genus article without good cause, such as Hyaenodon and Triceratops. If there is extensive research on individual species (such as with Mammuthus) then splitting makes sense, but splitting species articles on more obscure creatures would lead to a lot of unneeded repetition User:Dunkleosteus77 | push to talk 23:28, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Categories:
- Redirect-Class mammal articles
- NA-importance mammal articles
- WikiProject Mammals articles
- Redirect-Class Palaeontology articles
- NA-importance Palaeontology articles
- NA-importance Redirect-Class Palaeontology articles
- WikiProject Palaeontology articles
- Redirect-Class Primate articles
- NA-importance Primate articles
- WikiProject Primates articles
|
| This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| The contents of the Lufengpithecus hudienensis page were merged into Lufengpithecus on 3 October 2019 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of this discussion was Merged. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 10:22, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
- Support it is highly unusual for extinct species to have their own page instead of all of them being discussed in the genus article without good cause, such as Hyaenodon and Triceratops. If there is extensive research on individual species (such as with Mammuthus) then splitting makes sense, but splitting species articles on more obscure creatures would lead to a lot of unneeded repetition User:Dunkleosteus77 | push to talk 23:28, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Categories:
- Redirect-Class mammal articles
- NA-importance mammal articles
- WikiProject Mammals articles
- Redirect-Class Palaeontology articles
- NA-importance Palaeontology articles
- NA-importance Redirect-Class Palaeontology articles
- WikiProject Palaeontology articles
- Redirect-Class Primate articles
- NA-importance Primate articles
- WikiProject Primates articles