Ludwig Augustinsson has been listed as one of the
Sports and recreation good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: November 28, 2016. ( Reviewed version). |
Ludwig Augustinsson received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
This article was nominated for deletion on 25 February 2013. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 17:38, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I will be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon.
JAG
UAR 17:38, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguations: No links found.
Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.
This article contains some broken English and confusing sentences, but I think it stands a chance of meeting the GA criteria if all of the issues are addressed. I'll leave this on hold for the standard seven days. Please let me know if you have any questions JAG UAR 12:50, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Second of all, all the sources is very reliable, I've sourced mostly from the biggest papers from England, Denmark aswell as Sweden.
Point by point during "It is reasonable well written"
// Psemmler ( talk) 17:27, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ludwig Augustinsson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:30, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Ludwig Augustinsson has been listed as one of the
Sports and recreation good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: November 28, 2016. ( Reviewed version). |
Ludwig Augustinsson received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
This article was nominated for deletion on 25 February 2013. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 17:38, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I will be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon.
JAG
UAR 17:38, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguations: No links found.
Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.
This article contains some broken English and confusing sentences, but I think it stands a chance of meeting the GA criteria if all of the issues are addressed. I'll leave this on hold for the standard seven days. Please let me know if you have any questions JAG UAR 12:50, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Second of all, all the sources is very reliable, I've sourced mostly from the biggest papers from England, Denmark aswell as Sweden.
Point by point during "It is reasonable well written"
// Psemmler ( talk) 17:27, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ludwig Augustinsson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:30, 8 January 2018 (UTC)