From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lucas Ocampos/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 17:38, 25 November 2016 (UTC) reply


Hi, I will be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAG UAR  17:38, 25 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    The lead requires an expansion for it to summarise the article. For an article this size I would say that it needs at least a paragraph and not just one sentence, per WP:LEAD
    "Having started only 7 matches by the end of January 2015" - seven (I think in this case it needs to be written out)
    "where he paired up with compatiot Marcelo Bielsa" - I don't know what this means
    Ref 24 is missing an access date
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a ( reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):
    No original research found.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a ( major aspects): b ( focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b ( appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

The only thing holding this back is the length of the lead. It needs to be expanded to at least a paragraph (a few more sentences should do it) for it to meet WP:LEADLENGTH. Other than that, it is well written and comprehensive so it should easily pass afterwards. JAG UAR  13:04, 27 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Edits

Hi Jaguar ( talk, thanks for reviewing the article. I have made the following corrections as per your above recommendations.

  • The lead has been extended and gives a broad overview of his career so far with key points.
  • '7' has been changed to 'seven'
  • I have added an access date to ref 24
  • 'compatiot' is meant to read 'compatriot' - Bielsa and Ocampos are from the same nation. I have corrected the spelling thereof.

Cheers, Liam E. Bekker ( talk) 16:04, 27 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Thank you for the responses! I've checked through the article again and I'm happy that it meets the criteria now. I thought it might of meant 'compatriot'... JAG UAR  21:22, 27 November 2016 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lucas Ocampos/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 17:38, 25 November 2016 (UTC) reply


Hi, I will be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAG UAR  17:38, 25 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    The lead requires an expansion for it to summarise the article. For an article this size I would say that it needs at least a paragraph and not just one sentence, per WP:LEAD
    "Having started only 7 matches by the end of January 2015" - seven (I think in this case it needs to be written out)
    "where he paired up with compatiot Marcelo Bielsa" - I don't know what this means
    Ref 24 is missing an access date
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a ( reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):
    No original research found.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a ( major aspects): b ( focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b ( appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

The only thing holding this back is the length of the lead. It needs to be expanded to at least a paragraph (a few more sentences should do it) for it to meet WP:LEADLENGTH. Other than that, it is well written and comprehensive so it should easily pass afterwards. JAG UAR  13:04, 27 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Edits

Hi Jaguar ( talk, thanks for reviewing the article. I have made the following corrections as per your above recommendations.

  • The lead has been extended and gives a broad overview of his career so far with key points.
  • '7' has been changed to 'seven'
  • I have added an access date to ref 24
  • 'compatiot' is meant to read 'compatriot' - Bielsa and Ocampos are from the same nation. I have corrected the spelling thereof.

Cheers, Liam E. Bekker ( talk) 16:04, 27 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Thank you for the responses! I've checked through the article again and I'm happy that it meets the criteria now. I thought it might of meant 'compatriot'... JAG UAR  21:22, 27 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook