![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
FIRST FUEL ADDITIVE
This is factually incorrect and I have removed said claim. The Bell Performance company created the first fuel additive in 1909, predating the Lubrizol claim. Chancat74 ( talk) 19:37, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Editors, I am Maureen and I have a conflict of interest as I work for The Lubrizol Corporation. I started an account on Wikipedia to improve this article, which is quite outdated and gives undue weight to certain subjects. I am in the process of creating drafts to divide this article into sections to bring it in line with other company articles on Wikipedia. To start, I have created a History section and posted it in my user space.
Can an editor, or editors, review the draft and move the edits into the live article if they are neutral and appropriately cited?
I noted this on my user page, but I will write it again here in the spirit of transparency: I have edited this article directly from this account previously. That was before I was familiar with Wikipedia's conflict of interest rules and Terms of Use. Those three edits were posted in late 2015 ( November 24, 2015; November 24, 2015; and December 8, 2015). Now that I understand the rules more clearly, my involvement will stay on Talk pages. Lz maor ( Talk · COI--Lubrizol employee) 21:44, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Done
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Editors, Similar to my work above, I have created an Operations section in my user space. Again, I am trying to bring this article in line with other company articles on Wikipedia.
This Operations section could replace the current About section. The About section is dated and gives undue weight. For example:
@ Devopam: Would you be interested in reviewing this draft, too? Thank you. Lz maor ( Talk · COI--Lubrizol employee) 15:07, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
@ Maproom: Your January 31 edit addressed the first two bullets (above) in this edit request. If you get a chance, I would be interested in what you think of the rest of the request. Thank you for any advice you can give. Lz maor ( Talk · COI--Lubrizol employee) 21:47, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Editors, I am here with another edit request. Since editors have been so helpful in improving this article and giving it some structure, the intro and infobox draft I added to my user page essentially ties a few loose ends.
In the infobox, I'm looking to delete mention of oilfield solutions as a Division, as this is no longer correct. Secondly, Products can be listed as "Specialty chemicals, not "Lubricant additives and Speciality chemicals".
My draft adds a few tweaks to the existing intro. The changes include:
@ Whoisjohngalt: Could you also consider the appropriateness of the last two paragraphs of the History section? The manufacturing unit in India is just one part of our entire worldwide operations, and the Leetsdale, Pennsylvania, fire was a breaking news story with nearly no follow-up coverage, so I wonder if they should be included in an encyclopedia article.
Lastly, we mention in History that Lubrizol created a third business segment, Lubrizol Oilfield Solutions, following the purchase of businesses from Weatherford International. Since that segment is no longer part of Lubrizol's business, can we add the following:
Due to my stated COI, can an editor, or editors, review the draft and move the edits into the live article if they are neutral and appropriately cited? Lz maor ( Talk · COI--Lubrizol employee) 19:31, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
References
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Editors, I am here with a new request to update this article. These edits are largely aimed at updating this page and more-accurately describing the company's operations.
The following may be updated: revenue figure and number of employees in the infobox and the second sentence in the second paragraph of the introduction.
Could the following introductory sentence be added to the Operations section:
Due to my stated COI, can an editor, or editors, review this request and move the edits into the live article if they are neutral and appropriately cited? @ Whoisjohngalt: You helped update this article before, do you have time to consider these edits? Lz maor ( Talk · COI--Lubrizol employee) 14:10, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
References
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
FIRST FUEL ADDITIVE
This is factually incorrect and I have removed said claim. The Bell Performance company created the first fuel additive in 1909, predating the Lubrizol claim. Chancat74 ( talk) 19:37, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Editors, I am Maureen and I have a conflict of interest as I work for The Lubrizol Corporation. I started an account on Wikipedia to improve this article, which is quite outdated and gives undue weight to certain subjects. I am in the process of creating drafts to divide this article into sections to bring it in line with other company articles on Wikipedia. To start, I have created a History section and posted it in my user space.
Can an editor, or editors, review the draft and move the edits into the live article if they are neutral and appropriately cited?
I noted this on my user page, but I will write it again here in the spirit of transparency: I have edited this article directly from this account previously. That was before I was familiar with Wikipedia's conflict of interest rules and Terms of Use. Those three edits were posted in late 2015 ( November 24, 2015; November 24, 2015; and December 8, 2015). Now that I understand the rules more clearly, my involvement will stay on Talk pages. Lz maor ( Talk · COI--Lubrizol employee) 21:44, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Done
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Editors, Similar to my work above, I have created an Operations section in my user space. Again, I am trying to bring this article in line with other company articles on Wikipedia.
This Operations section could replace the current About section. The About section is dated and gives undue weight. For example:
@ Devopam: Would you be interested in reviewing this draft, too? Thank you. Lz maor ( Talk · COI--Lubrizol employee) 15:07, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
@ Maproom: Your January 31 edit addressed the first two bullets (above) in this edit request. If you get a chance, I would be interested in what you think of the rest of the request. Thank you for any advice you can give. Lz maor ( Talk · COI--Lubrizol employee) 21:47, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Editors, I am here with another edit request. Since editors have been so helpful in improving this article and giving it some structure, the intro and infobox draft I added to my user page essentially ties a few loose ends.
In the infobox, I'm looking to delete mention of oilfield solutions as a Division, as this is no longer correct. Secondly, Products can be listed as "Specialty chemicals, not "Lubricant additives and Speciality chemicals".
My draft adds a few tweaks to the existing intro. The changes include:
@ Whoisjohngalt: Could you also consider the appropriateness of the last two paragraphs of the History section? The manufacturing unit in India is just one part of our entire worldwide operations, and the Leetsdale, Pennsylvania, fire was a breaking news story with nearly no follow-up coverage, so I wonder if they should be included in an encyclopedia article.
Lastly, we mention in History that Lubrizol created a third business segment, Lubrizol Oilfield Solutions, following the purchase of businesses from Weatherford International. Since that segment is no longer part of Lubrizol's business, can we add the following:
Due to my stated COI, can an editor, or editors, review the draft and move the edits into the live article if they are neutral and appropriately cited? Lz maor ( Talk · COI--Lubrizol employee) 19:31, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
References
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Editors, I am here with a new request to update this article. These edits are largely aimed at updating this page and more-accurately describing the company's operations.
The following may be updated: revenue figure and number of employees in the infobox and the second sentence in the second paragraph of the introduction.
Could the following introductory sentence be added to the Operations section:
Due to my stated COI, can an editor, or editors, review this request and move the edits into the live article if they are neutral and appropriately cited? @ Whoisjohngalt: You helped update this article before, do you have time to consider these edits? Lz maor ( Talk · COI--Lubrizol employee) 14:10, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
References