 | This article was nominated for deletion on 19 July 2011. The result of the discussion was Speedy keep. |
|
| This article was nominated for deletion on 8 October 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 5 September 2018 and 7 December 2018. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Rainydey.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 02:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article is kind of pointless on its own. Low poly is a pretty meaningless/relative term (just like high-poly). Maybe merge this article with Polygon mesh ?
- High poly is not really a unique aesthetic style, whereas low-poly is. I will try and update the page to make it a little more pointed towards aesthetics, while still maintaining its relevance in computer graphics. Rainydey ( talk) 17:30, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Kind of pointless section, no new content at all. Also unsourced DemonDays64 ( talk) 02:26, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
This is a pretty poorly written article. "==Necessity for lowfor display by a computer" is a phrase in the article. A later section even says "Since the display of computer graphics has become very efficient, allowing the display of tens to hundreds of thousands of polygons at 25 frames per second..." which is simply outdated. It doesn't even have a citation. 73.50.214.100 ( talk) 11:40, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
i mean it should stay there its funny but who thought of that? 108.31.15.173 ( talk) 22:38, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- user 98.117.182.181 seems to have made the change here https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Low_poly&type=revision&diff=962870741&oldid=962589127 8.24.98.130 ( talk) 15:36, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
- im gonna remove the link. please talk with me if i should not have! Bumpf ( talk) 21:52, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[insert witty meta-text on wikipedia signatures here]
|
| This article was nominated for deletion on 19 July 2011. The result of the discussion was Speedy keep. |
|
| This article was nominated for deletion on 8 October 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
|
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 5 September 2018 and 7 December 2018. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Rainydey.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 02:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article is kind of pointless on its own. Low poly is a pretty meaningless/relative term (just like high-poly). Maybe merge this article with Polygon mesh ?
- High poly is not really a unique aesthetic style, whereas low-poly is. I will try and update the page to make it a little more pointed towards aesthetics, while still maintaining its relevance in computer graphics. Rainydey ( talk) 17:30, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Kind of pointless section, no new content at all. Also unsourced DemonDays64 ( talk) 02:26, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
This is a pretty poorly written article. "==Necessity for lowfor display by a computer" is a phrase in the article. A later section even says "Since the display of computer graphics has become very efficient, allowing the display of tens to hundreds of thousands of polygons at 25 frames per second..." which is simply outdated. It doesn't even have a citation. 73.50.214.100 ( talk) 11:40, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
i mean it should stay there its funny but who thought of that? 108.31.15.173 ( talk) 22:38, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- user 98.117.182.181 seems to have made the change here https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Low_poly&type=revision&diff=962870741&oldid=962589127 8.24.98.130 ( talk) 15:36, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
- im gonna remove the link. please talk with me if i should not have! Bumpf ( talk) 21:52, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[insert witty meta-text on wikipedia signatures here]