Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: -- Blackjacks101 ( talk) 14:19, 15 March 2011 (UTC) reply

I will review.

Since non-members are not allowed to review GA's I will step in =D-- Blackjacks101 ( talk) 14:18, 15 March 2011 (UTC) reply

Hey the article was great, since I won't have much time this weekend to check back on this I just did the small problems for you. Overall it was an amazing article that flowed easily. It also gave a lot of detail which impressed me a lot. Keep up the great work with Miley Cyrus and Taylor Swift articles!-- Blackjacks101 ( talk) 19:46, 18 March 2011 (UTC) reply

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): ( MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): (citations to reliable sources): ( OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   -- Blackjacks101 ( talk) 19:46, 18 March 2011 (UTC) reply